The Tommy Robinson timeline

Alex Jones [Infowars] is the most annoying person – people want to hear what Caolan Robertson says on what went on in the courtroom and just as he’s about to speak, Jones comes in with one of his loud infomercials and so we don’t get to hear anything until 11.42. Godfrey Bloom knows nothing about it so why does Jones concentrate on him?

The Caolan Robertson testimony [11:42]

Another one which set it out well [courtesy Pcar] was this:

Rebel Media take

A most important take was the one called George, part of TR’s team, now with Lauren Southern in Canada:

The Lauren Southern take

The summary

From these, we find that:

1. Huddersfield Examiner ran a report on the trial of the Muslims on May 11th, the second batch of three batches, its last day was last Friday. This seems to be where the TR team got the idea to go there but no reporters were there at all. Therefore, either the MSM had been told beforehand or they had a policy of not turning up to these trials. TR’s team had had no notice.

2. In his live streaming, he was quoting from the BBC online report which listed the names on trial and he quoted those names from that. He did not stand on the precinct of the courthouse but some distance away. He was using words like “alleged rapist”.

3. There were two incidents of significance before the arrest. Firstly, the judge was filmed through an upstairs window – the same one who later sentenced him and he was standing there with police officers. He was looking straight at the TR crew and laughing/grinning. Soon after, the police van arrived with seven officers.

4. The second incident was that the various accused, quite free and at large, not in custody, arrived for the trial’s last day and words were exchanged between Caolan R and them, not TR himself, who was still some distance away. As this was filmed by the TR team, then this would have been of more significance as interference than what TR was doing. Yet they did not arrest CR. Not just that but where that happened near the door, the judge above could not have seen this bit going on. Therefore, the judge ordered the van on the strength of seeing TR with a mobile phone, through a window.

5. At that point, it had to be suspicion of commenting on the case, as the judge could not know what was being said – TR might have been phoning his wife for all he knew. Everyone has seen the actual arrest and it was not “on suspicion” of commenting on the trial in the least, it was for disturbing the peace. But the only people present were the TR crew, so what peace was being disturbed?

6. The contempt charge came later. They dropped the disturbing the peace bit and all sorts of things now happened. The court was obviously trying to keep CR and crew away, so TR was not added to the list for the day until moments before it actually started, then CR and the one called George were tweeted by someone internationally that TR was now on the list. Therefore, there was no chance of a lawyer briefing TR before the trial, as the trial began straight after TR was listed. That in itself was not due process.

7. Instead, a court-appointed lawyer was there, unbriefed, to represent TR and that person said that if TR pleaded guilty, he would be freed. CR and George got there to the courtroom as the judge began by looking at the live streaming footage, spent a few seconds on it, then stopped it and got on with the sentencing. Therefore, he could not conclude what TR had been saying by more than a few seconds, and that part was quoting the Beeb [see 2 above].

8. There was no reference by the judge to the previous suspended sentence – it did not arise. The conviction was based on the judge’s tens seconds long viewing of the live stream downstairs and the charge was now contempt. There was no jury of course – the judge was the jury. All through this, he was looking straight at CR [according to CR], not at TR himself.

9. TR was then taken away for 13 months, possibly reduced by half for good behaviour later. There was no communication out or in from or to TR. The gag was now placed on all UK publications that nothing about these proceedings could be reported on.

10. Many people tweeted, blogged and youtubed on the basis of anything coming out and by definition, it was without all the information, there was much speculation by those hostile to TR and that speculation did defy the ban but was not touched by the authorities.

11. Local MSM [UK] put pressure on the judge to lift the ban – they wanted to run hit pieces on TR. The judge agreed and the ban was lifted, the hit pieces then appeared at the BBC and Mail, minus comments sections. But it also lifted the ban from us.

20 comments for “The Tommy Robinson timeline

  1. May 30, 2018 at 8:14 am

    Some more points:

    Blocked Dwarf:

    … was the fact that TR only had the change in his pocket when arrested and so couldn’t access the phone etc in prison. If you were *intending* to/thought you might get arrested you would have things like cash on you etc.

    Bill:

    Point 5. It is the Queens peace which is being disturbed.

    Point 11. Apparently it was the Independent of all media organs which challenged the ban successfully.

  2. john in cheshire
    May 30, 2018 at 9:07 am

    It shows how naive I am, I thought his lawyer would have secured Tommy Robinson’s release yesterday.

    They are going to dig their heels in and keep him inside, waiting until people’s attention is directed elsewhere and then something cruel and vindictive will happen to Tommy Robinson. I suspect that’s their plan.
    Oh hope someone is keeping a list of all those involved in this wicked deed.

    • June 2, 2018 at 7:45 am

      His lawyer might have, but the useless duty solicitor clearly wasn’t going to…

      • john in cheshire
        June 2, 2018 at 2:39 pm

        I’ve read somewhere ( and I can’t remember where) that both the judge and the appointed solicitor in Tommy Robinson’s perfunctory trial are members of the same law firm and this law firm tends to deal with cases defending muslim criminals.
        Is that true? I don’t know.
        Is that relevant? Possibly.

  3. Mona
    May 30, 2018 at 9:11 am

    Look upon Tommy Robinson’s incarceration as a blessing in disguise, just been watching a video by Tommy on Real TNTV “Tommy Robinson speaks out on the Horrific Murder of 3 Boys”, ,This is May’s Britain today, my question, who is running the Police?

  4. Bill
    May 30, 2018 at 9:45 am

    In 2011 a Stephon Christoper Lennon was in court in Southwark for “Possession of false identity documents with improper intention”.
    In 2014 a Stephen Chistopher Yaxley-Lennon was in court in St Albans for “Conspiracy to defraud (2 counts)”.
    In 2018 a Stephen (aka Tommy Robinson) Yaxley-Lennon was in court in Canturbury for “Contempt of court Breach of suspended sentence”

    Three different legal persons being convicted in court on three separate occasions.
    Weirdly on the lawpages.com where I found this information there is no record of this 2017 case.
    https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/coc-yaxley-lennon-20170522.pdf

    What is staggering is the question of where he gets his funding from. From 2007 to 2010 he was a plumber and a director of this company https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05450091/officers
    Since then he has been in and out of prison, traveled abroad, developed the uncanny knack of being in the right place at the right time so how he funds his escapades is key to gaining an understanding of what role he is playing, for me anyways.

    • Mona
      May 30, 2018 at 3:07 pm

      Find another planet Bill ” what is staggering where he gets his money from ?” People admire him for his Truth telling ,Courage he is popular and now made famous by the police and a dickhead judge, no need for me to spell it out for you Eh Bill.

    • Distant Relative
      May 30, 2018 at 5:13 pm

      I heard he has a tanning salon?

  5. Bill
    May 30, 2018 at 2:43 pm

    Tommy Robinson is a made up legal person. It has been invented by god knows who and is played by an actor whose legal name is unknown.
    Andrew McMaster, Paul Harris, Stephen Christopher Laxley-Lennon, Stephen Lennon, Stephen Laxley-Lennon, Stephen Laxley are all further persona’s given to the actor.

    The legitimate passport (state issued) bears the name Paul Harris. No Paul Harris has any connection to EDL nor does one appear in court records no media records linked to the actors alleged activities.

    From the Huffington Post story. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/12/10/stephen-yaxley-lennon-describes-the-making-of-tommy-robinson_n_8747794.html
    “Well about Tommy Robinson, the man he has pretended to be since 2009.”
    “According to Robinson, his name “just depends where you met me”.”
    “Like any good raconteur, Robinson’s narratives, are never derailed by facts.”

    Here is Stephen Lennon being reported on by the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-14278957

    Once again we see this actor being in the right place “PC Field said: “[Lennon] was a prominent person at the front of the group, giving a ‘come on then’ gesture.”Lennon was the only person charged over the incident.
    “However, a brawl involving about 100 fans did erupt, with only seven officers present to deal with it.”
    So seven police officers subdue 100 fighting men and manage to arrest one of their number without sustaining any injuries themselves.

    More back story from before Tommy Robinson was invented http://www.coffeehousewall.co.uk/a-message-from-stephen-lennon-will-the-truth-out/

    Here is a list of Stephen Lennon adventures courtesy of the BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=stephen+lennon&sa_f=search-product&scope=

    • May 30, 2018 at 5:21 pm

      Wouldn’t put any store by the leftwing press – BBC, HuffPost etc. They lie as much as Snopes.

      • Distant Relative
        May 30, 2018 at 5:30 pm

        Speaking of Snopes – did you see their latest on Soros claiming he didn’t collaborate with the Nazis in Hungary even after Soros admitted he did several times in TV interviews?! All because Rosanne Barr tweeted it. 🙂

      • Bill
        May 30, 2018 at 5:53 pm

        I know. I am simply digging into the back story. All we are being told about the latest event comes from the crew who were there who weren’t arrested and the media who weren’t present. We have no idea how many were in his crew but there must have been at least two yet only one, the presenter, was arrested for ‘breaching the peace’.
        As far as I can tell not a soul commenting on here was subscribed to his livestream, not a soul here knew the trial he was covering was in process, no-one was in the public gallery, no journalists were present inside or outside the court. In short we know nothing about the event.

        • Mona
          May 30, 2018 at 7:26 pm

          Bill it was live on Alex Jones , with a bum like you here I will never contaminate my brain cells reading your garbage just stick the local news in Wales.. bye bye for good

    • June 2, 2018 at 7:46 am

      Would you like some more tinfoil, Bill?

  6. Bill
    May 30, 2018 at 7:49 pm

    Here is a transcript from a page on the cps site that has been shifted and it can no longer be found.
    But this page has its content, thankfully.
    http://forum.globalgulag.com/index.php?topic=673.255;wap2

    24/01/2014
    http://www.cps.gov.uk/thames_chiltern/cps_thames_and_chiltern_news/five_sentenced_for_mortgagae_fraud___herts/

    Five people were sentenced at St Albans Crown Court yesterday, Thursday, 24 January 2014, in a mortgage fraud case.

    The five, including corrupt mortgage broker Deborah Rothschild, were involved in a complicated conspiracy to acquire properties using various fraudulent means.

    All five had pleaded guilty at earlier hearings to fraud offences, mostly of committing fraud by false representation. Yesterday three were sentenced by Judge Bright QC at St Albans Crown Court to prison and others to suspended sentences.

    Stephen Yaxley Lennon, aged 31, from Bedfordshire, pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by misrepresentation and was sentenced to eighteen months in prison.

    Steven Vowles, aged 26, of Heron Drive, Luton, pleaded guilty to committing fraud by false representation and transferring criminal property. He had also earlier pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine and being concerned in the supply of class A drugs. He was sentenced to six months imprisonment for the fraud offences and 21 months for the drugs offences, making a total of 27 months imprisonment.

    Anjee Darcy, aged 31, of Hardwick Green, Luton, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation, false accounting and fraud by false representation. She was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment suspended for 18 months, and ordered to complete 200 hours of unpaid work.

    Mortgage broker, Deborah Rothschild, aged 42, Park Road, Toddington, pleaded guilty to four counts of committing fraud by false representation. She was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment for her part in facilitating the fraudulent mortgages.

    Lisa Moore, aged 27, of Newbury Close Silsoe, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation. She was sentenced to six months imprisonment suspended for 18 months, ordered to complete 100 hours of unpaid work, and pay £1500 costs.

    Other charges were ordered to lie on file. Charges of cheating the revenue against Lennon and his wife were not proceeded with through the criminal justice system. This will now be handled by HM Revenue and Customs to pursue through civil processes.

    On 26 January 2009, a bungalow at Bletchley owned by Lennon was sold to Anjee Darcy, who on the same day used the bungalow as a deposit to buy a £500,000 house in Watford. She could only afford the mortgage by using a fraudulent application to The Abbey facilitated by Rothschild. Darcy and Rothschild used false pay slips to support the application.

    Further associate members of the group went on to purchase properties with deposits on occasions provided by Lennon and with mortgages fraudulently brokered by Rothschild.

    The defendants have assets already under restraint by the courts and now the Crown will proceed with confiscation applications under the Proceeds of Crime Act. This means assets and money gained by criminal means can be taken by the state and returned to the taxpayer.

    — End quote —

    Rothschild eh!

    Nothing to see here, move along, move along

  7. May 31, 2018 at 12:33 am

    Yet it’s fairly obvious that Geoffrey Marson QC has breached the 2013 Judicial Guidelines on the conduct of trial judges, as amply demonstrated in item your 3 (Not to mention the Bangalore Principles as enshrined in international law). It could successfully be argued that he caused Robinson (Yaxley-Lennon, whatever) to be arrested, then tried and sentenced him. A clear breach of impartiality.

    I don’t particularly care for Robinson’s antics, but that is demonstrably not justice. In acting as they have, the powers that be have just chucked petrol on a very small fire.

  8. james wilson
    June 1, 2018 at 5:38 pm

    Now it should be told. I couldn’t find a man left in England, both honest and courageous, to stand up for England, so I hired an actor with a death wish.

  9. Bill
    June 2, 2018 at 6:29 pm

    Intriguing.
    “Ziggy M
    June 1, 2018 at 3:38 pm

    John, perhaps having been made aware of the fact at Canterbury that his actions could have lead to a mistrial, and the the defendants walking free. He assumed the second time the police would step in and walk him away…or he got what you think he didn’t deserved. But what he wanted
    There’s another story doing the rounds about him and a number of his friends, which if it does grow legs and proves to be true will finish him.”

    https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2018/06/01/feedback-tommy-robinson-under-the-cosh-and-bankers-above-the-law/#comments

Comments are closed.