Title comes from Chuckles, from whom the article also comes.
Judging the credibility of a source from such a distance in time is not easy, but sometimes a single telling detail provides an important clue. In revisiting Huddleston’s book, I noticed he casually mentioned that in Spring 1940 the French and British had been on the very verge of a military attack against Soviet Russia, which they regarded as Germany’s crucial ally, and planned an assault on Baku, intending to destroy Stalin’s great oil fields of the Caucasus by a strategic bombing campaign.
I had never read a single mention of this in any of my World War II histories, and until recently I would have dismissed the story as an absurd rumor of that era, long since debunked. But just a couple of weeks ago, I discovered a 2015 article in The National Interest confirming these exact facts, over seventy years after they had understandably been expunged from all of our mainstream historical narratives.
One only need look at the Skripals and the latest one and it’s clear that it’s who’s telling the tale – there is so much concealed history going on. We know about Chechnyan atrocities by Basayev and there is Beslan but I know of an atrocity by Russian soldiers, spit roasting enemies. Don’t ask how I know.
The return of the Crimea to Russia was by plebiscite but this is never mentioned by the west [NATO.CIA] who support the Ukrainian usurpers.
We are in a time – if ever we weren’t in a time – when disinformation rules – and we need only look at CNN and Trump. May’s open betrayal is SO open, so transparent that one is deeply suspicious – is this all about the devil’s bargain she made to get power, that she was always going to leave with her image in further tatters than it was? Or does the fool really think she’d soing right?
Has she been Manchurian candidated? Has she any free will?
That’s where we are – we can trust nothing and nobody.