At a time when even bankers are hoarding food, it’s clear many are worried. Easy enough to be worried about the visible things – harder to be worried about the obscure and concealed.
At the beginning of OoL, I ran a post on the World Core Curriculum and was horrified that Mueller’s ideas were taken so seriously, had been adopted and that it had gone so far worldwide.
Over the past few years, I’ve been applying for various overseas educational posts and have occasionally reached interview. What has come through strongly is the ideas permeating this world curriculum, inc the IB and this is reflected in the names, e.g. World College, Kuala Lumpur, International College, Shanghai – even Russian universities are changing their names to include “of the Humanities” which, when explored, means the teaching of Humanism.
Whatever your views on Humanism, it is being pushed openly in schools via curricula, along with all the environmental claptrap. Apart from this immense push to educate all the world’s children, with UNESCO facilitation, there is Agenda 21:
And of course, they have their summits and check that the agenda is being implemented:
The upcoming World Summit on Sustainable Development will aim to answer the following questions, among others: What has been accomplished since 1992? What have the participating countries done so far to implement Agenda 21? Have they adopted the National Sustainable Development Strategies as they agreed they would by 2002? Have they ratified the conventions that aim to prevent loss of biodiversity or ensure women’s rights as they agreed to do in 1992?
The field is so vast and the folder is bulging, so much so that I don’t even know where to start on this topic. It’s horrifying what really is being done to education and how propagandist it has really become. The basics are secondary to the message. It would take a dissertation to put all this material across but American Thinker touches on it here:
A detailed history on sustainable development, definitions, and critical actions can be found here. Section III of the Agenda 21 Plan addresses local community sustainable development. The Preamble and Chapter 28 discuss how Agenda 21 should be implemented at a local level. The United Nations purposely recommends avoiding the term Agenda 21 and suggests a cleverly named alternative: “smart growth.” The United Nations Millennium Papers – Issue 2(page 5) says this of Agenda 21 and smart growth:
Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth.
So this is a UN driven conglomeration of all the loony gaia/NWO/sustainable development/Monsanto/earth day stuff meets micro-control, salami slice by salami slice, supported by PCism, all fed into the K-12 school curriculum, not to mention the respective attitudes to evolution and G-d. It’s producing the new godless, dumb, non critically thinking, state-educated child of the C21st, so beloved of Them:
Education is a key ingredient in the transformation to a sustainable society. The UN Commission on Sustainable Development reports that in America, “the national strategy on education is prepared by the Department of Education and includes such programmes as Goals 2000 and School to Work” (emphasis added).
The National Environmental Education Advisory Council to the Department of Education consists of eleven individuals appointed by the EPA Administrator and includes representatives of women, NGOs, and local authorities (visioning councils). The U.S. State Department reported to the UN that:
“At the primary school level, school curricula have already been reviewed and revised, and at the secondary school level, the revision of school curricula is being undertaken currently to address environment and development as a cross cutting issue.”
The State Department also told the UN:
“The U.S. has been involved in several awareness raising programmes and activities aimmed at the population at large (Earth Day, industry supported campaigns, Ad Council, Program KAB, Arbor Day, GLOBE Program, Discovery Channel, National Geographic programmes, CNN, ZooQ, As it Happens, and water clean-up programmes.”
Naturally, as the second last quote points out, it’s going to provoke hostility in UN watchers and anyone who wakes up to what is really going on – that’s factored in and people producing posts such as this one now are marginalized by the simple expedient of labelling them the loons and dismissing them as conspiracy theorists.
There is no theory in this – read the curricula for yourselves – satisfy yourselves as to what is being taught. And golly-gosh, guess what one of the main targets is? Who’dathunkit?
This agenda for the 21st Century was signed by 179 nations at the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Among other things, it called for a Global Biodiversity Assessment of the state of the planet. Prepared by the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP), this GBA armed UN leaders with the “information” and “science” they needed to validate their global management system.
Its doomsday predictions were designed to excuse radical population reduction, oppressive lifestyle regulations, and a coercive return to earth-centered religions as the basis for environmental values and self-sustaining human settlements.
The GBA concluded on page 763 that “the root causes of the loss of biodiversity are embedded in the way societies use resources.” The main culprit? Judeo-Christian values. Chapter 12.2.3 states that-
“This world view is characteristic of large scale societies, heavily dependent on resources brought from considerable distances. It is a world view that is characterized by the denial of sacred attributes in nature, a characteristic that became firmly established about 2000 years ago with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religious traditions.
“Eastern cultures with religious traditions such as Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism did not depart as drastically from the perspective of humans as members of a community of beings including other living and non-living elements.”
They just had to add that finishing touch to it, didn’t they, which gives the game away. They already had people in the palms of their hands – just look at Longrider’s post and comments, the N1 post at OoL:
and you’ll see what I mean. People were already heavily into denial of any benefits the Judaeo-Christian traditions had brought them, as opposed to posts by a minority pointing out that LR and the rest of us only have that freedom to believe because of those very traditions in the first place.
So here now is the GBA stating precisely who the target is, why and what the intention is … and they swan along, unfettered, putting it in place because people are either blissfully unaware or heavily into denial: “It’s just not happening, nothing to see here, move along.”.
Why are Them devoting such time to eradicating the JCT? Because the JCT is a major obstacle to this world agenda, in their eyes. Do your own research and see how they appear to be quite fixated with the need for this eradication.