Why “progressives” are anything but


But the list of progressive fallacies exposed by Obama is much longer. He has laid bare the hypocrisies and failures of the race-based identity politics that lie behind affirmative action and other racialist policies.

Then there’s the obvious dishonesty of progressive claims to care for the welfare of the “people” and battle for their interests against the elite. Remember Al Gore’s 2000 campaign slogan, “The People vs the Powerful”? Or Occupy Wall Street’s “We are the 99%”? In the progressive worldview, public employees who earn more than private sector workers, enjoy greater job security, and get gold-plated health and retirement benefits are the downtrodden workers that evil capitalist stooges like Wisconsin’s Scott Walker are eager to destroy.

In fact, it is the progressives who are the party of big-money elites out of touch with the average American. In 2008 Obama reaped a third of a billion dollars from blue-state plutocrats like Goldman Sachs, the University of California, Time-Warner, Google, and Microsoft.

This trolling for cash in America’s richest zip codes is continuing this election cycle, which has seen Vogue editor Anna Wintour offer hoi polloi a chance to win a seat at her fundraiser for Obama. Even liberal Juan Williams saw the class snobbery of letting “someone who reeks of ornamental excess announce that the peasants can have a place at the table.”

Meanwhile, the most populist, grass-roots political movement in decades, the Tea Party, is slandered as racist hillbillies clinging to their guns and religion.

Next is the big lie that progressives are all about human freedom. What they have promoted is more accurately called license: the selfish freedom to do whatever you want no matter what the cost, which then must be picked up by the taxpayer.

Hence the elevation of abortion into the most important sacrament in the progressive church. Sexual pleasure and license can now appear to be “cost free” because no matter how careless or stupid people are, the consequences of their bad choices can be eliminated or mitigated on somebody else’s nickel.

Progressive freedom is all about the freedom to indulge selfish appetites without the restraints of virtue, shame, guilt, or morality––unless, of course, one desires to better oneself economically without the state meddling in your business and filching your earnings. Then we will hear fire-and-brimstone sermons about the “greed” of the “selfish”, redolent of Cotton Mather.

Genuine political freedom, on the other hand, the freedom to run our lives and the state according to high principles that seek to make us better human beings worthy of freedom, always entails the need for personal responsibility and accountability, and the acceptance of risk and failure.

But these are all anathema to the progressive, who wants the state to take responsibility for our actions, insulate us from the consequences of our bad choices, and compensate for our loss of true freedom by distracting us with the license to gratify our appetites.

As political philosophers from Plato to Tocqueville have pointed out, this “soft despotism” ends up empowering the state and “enlightened” elites, and thus puts at risk our political freedom and autonomy.

Finally, the arch-virtue of the progressive, tolerance, is in fact the rankest intolerance. We should tolerate pornography and vulgarity in the public square, but stamp out religious speech or criminalize conservative criticism as “hate speech.”

We should understand and sympathize with the terrorist and not rush to judge him, but reflexively condemn and hound those who try to stop him.

We should seek out and promote diverse points of view, but censor or silence those of “conservatives” and other ideological reprobates.

We should show “civility” in our political discourse, but savage with relish political enemies.

We should admire and privilege non-Western religions, but attack Christianity and Judaism as oppressive superstitions.

We should praise and promote all lifestyles no matter how distasteful or sordid, yet ridicule traditional mores and virtues.

We should root out racism, sexism, and homophobia, but make an exception for minorities, feminists, and Muslims.

Failed economic theory, illiberal racial policies, elitist snobbery, political freedom reduced to selfish license, and intolerance of disagreement and dissent––these are some of the pathologies of progressivism that have been illustrated every day of Obama’s presidency.

6 comments for “Why “progressives” are anything but

  1. Greg Tingey
    June 19, 2012 at 8:24 am

    Failed economic theory – disaster capitalism
    You are sadly deluded.
    But, then so are many of the people mis-labelled as “progressives” – who are nothing of the sort.
    Right-wing – does emphatically NOT mean freedom, as resiodents of the USA under the vile Shrub found out.

  2. June 19, 2012 at 8:38 am

    There used to be a really good exposé of progressivism on the Internet. I can’t find it these days. One of those essays I should have saved to my hard drive.

  3. john in cheshire
    June 19, 2012 at 9:32 am

    James, more hometruths from Frontpagemagazine.
    Progressive = Marxist
    And the disturbing thing is that Mr Cameron and some Conservatives use the word in speeches and they must know what they it means when they do so.

  4. June 19, 2012 at 9:32 am

    Interesting that Greg is so out of step with the opinion most of us express, e.g. in your comment now, LR and yet he persists in calling others deluded. Is this the mark of genius? 😉

  5. The Nameless Libertarian
    June 19, 2012 at 9:10 pm

    Like liberal, the word progressive has been battered to the point of rendering it meaningless. At the same time, you’re absolutely right to point about that it has been adopted by people who are anything other progressive.

    I’d be a bit wary of citing Plato in any defence of liberty in the face of its enemies. From the contents of the Republic he was anything other than a friend of liberty, responsibility, and autonomy.

  6. Greg Tingey
    June 20, 2012 at 8:34 am

    NO “progressiv != Marxist
    This is just plain WORNG….
    Marxists call THEMSELVES progressives, but in fact they are a form of vicious reactionary – because they are religious believers.
    Which is why they find it so esy to kill lots of people, just like, oh Arnoud Amoury, as an example …..

    My training is in physics and engineering, so I try to look at the facts, not the propaganda, difficult though that is a lot of the time …..

Comments are closed.