I wonder if this is exposing McAlpine or doing his dirty work for him? There’s a duty to OoL not to bring anything down on the guys and gal and nothing down on you, the reader. These litigious bastards are looking for any signs of dissent whatever to drop lawsuits onto … so we can go the sane, safe way at OoL and stay absolutely shtum on the matter or we can go the Slog way and say what we really think.
Choosing the latter, below is reprinted, with no additions or deletions, what came to me via email, with no comment from OoL one way or the other.
Here is what came via email:
McAlpine’s Begging Letter in Full
And just because someone asked how it was possible to contact his Lordship if you wanted to pay him, here is the website link. RMPI. (though I think you’d be stupid to cave in to these threats and bullying.)
For those over 500 followers, I understand that he is demanding £500 plus £250 in administrative costs. (i.e. 10,000 claimed twitter retweets = £2.5 million in admin fees)
PS, his law firm are no win, no fee.
If you have a personal injury claim, RMPI believe you should be entitled to 100% of any compensation you are awarded in that claim. That’s why we operate on a no win, no fee basis. We will charge the responsible insurers for costs we incur on your behalf. Win or lose, you won’t be charged a penny.
McAllaboutrakinginthemoney’s lawyers have been busy on Google as well…
see this notice at the bottom of the page on google images.
In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 4 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read more about the request
To our readers – though comments are open for now, please be very, very careful with this litigious bastard. If you make any comment whatever on his innocence or not over the paedophilia, you run the risk of litigation and we at OoL must remove the comment as we’re all relative paupers and simply can’t afford justice as Lord McMoneybags can.
On the other hand, there is the principle of using lawyers to bully someone into silence and on that general principle, nothing to do with McUphimself at all, we should not bow to pressure. We didn’t allow it in the case of Usmanov and Shillings or whatever they call themselves – Carter Fuck or whatever – and we shouldn’t allow it now.
OoL supports the principle of needing to have airtight evidence before accusing someone of something, as a general principle and quite apart from the fear of litigation. On the other hand, OoL supports the principle of free speech on what we think on various issues as they arise.
So feel free to comment but bear in mind that some comments might have to be removed if they’re on the actual guilt or innocence of paedophilia.