The “liberal” establishment continues the relentless assault on the underpinnings of freedom – the heritage of Christian values and the Constitution [or the British equivalent].
AS the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.
Consider, for example, the assertion by the Senate minority leader last week that the House could not take up a plan by Senate Democrats to extend tax cuts on households making $250,000 or less because the Constitution requires that revenue measures originate in the lower chamber. Why should anyone care?
You can mark that one down with all the other unpatriotic claptrap over the years, small selection below:
June 28, 1945 – President Truman endorses world government in a speech: “It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.”
April 12, 1952 – CFR member John Foster Dulles [who later became Secretary of State, in speaking before the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, says: “Treaty law can override the Constitution. Treaties can take powers away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body, and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights.”
1962 – “The Future of Federalism” by Nelson Rockefeller claims that current events compellingly demand a “new world order.” He says there is: “A fever of nationalism…but the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks…These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order…Sooner perhaps than we may realize…there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.”
1973 – The Club of Rome, a U.N. operative, issues a report entitled “Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System.” This report divides the entire world into ten kingdoms.
The Club of Rome, of course, created the detested body which was to go on to be the EU.
April 1974 – Former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateral and CFR member Richard Gardner’s article “The Hard Road to World Order” is published in the CFR’s “Foreign Affairs,” where he states that: “…the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
There are many more in a similar vein. The very way in which the Christian tradition and the Constitution infuriate these people with their grandiose vision of enslavement is a most cogent reason for their preservation at all costs.
John Buchan had his character Scudder say, in The Thirty-Nine Steps :
‘They won up to a point, but they struck a bigger thing than money, a thing that couldn’t be bought, the old elemental fighting instincts of man. If you’re going to be killed you invent some kind of flag and country to fight for, and if you survive you get to love the thing.
Those foolish devils of soldiers have found something they care for, and that has upset the pretty plan laid in Berlin and Vienna. But my friends haven’t played their last card by a long sight. They’ve gotten the ace up their sleeves, and unless I can keep alive for a month they are going to play it and win.’
The “pretty plan” begins as a German takeover but soon broadens to world governance, with elements in Germany [those who promoted and maintain Merkel] dominating.
There is no inventing “some kind of” country – there is a country and it’s called the United States of America. There is another called England and one called the United Kingdom. The Brussels plan was not so much to break up the UK – that’s easy to achieve – but to break up England and to render barren and inapplicable English Common Law.
Buchan’s warnings are out of date? Edward Spalton:
From July, 2005, the German firm Arvato AG, a totally owned subsidiary of Bertelsmann AG, will take over the majority of the administration of the British local authority, the East Riding of Yorkshire, which has around 350,000 inhabitants. About five hundred local authority employees will switch to Bertelsmann.
The planning for continual military rearmament, contained in the proposed constitution, corresponds exactly with the German intention to strengthen its own military power, which is at present regarded as insufficient, with the help of the EU. Arising out of such thinking, political advisors from the milieu of the Bertelsmann Foundation, probably the most influential private German think tank, developed a scenario four years ago for a “Superpower Europe”.
Four years ago? It’s been around at least since Buchan and most certainly through the Third Reich, with heavily religious overtones, that religion being antithetical to Christianity.
Beware “Clubs” of anything, beware global rhetoric, beware any supranational body and beware any substitute religion, e.g.
Beware governments but also beware anarchy – both are inimical to people’s health and freedom. Call this post mad, call it insane but I, for one, would always go for mad and free any day, rather than compliant, complacent and in chains.