Why is it that plod when they get it wrong will often go to extreme lengths to try and justify what they did? Oh I’m sure we only get to read about the cases that go really wrong (well some of them) and not the many that go to plan. Still in this case a mistake if such it was could have been corrected on the day, not 8 months down the line.

Mail. (usual caveats)

A teenage girl with autism was arrested and hauled before the courts because police mistakenly assumed she was drunk.
Despite being completely sober, 17-year-old Melissa Jones spent ten hours in a police cell, was finger-printed and had her DNA taken.
She was charged with being drunk and disorderly, forced to appear in court and became suicidal while waiting eight months for her case to go to trial.
Last week, however, prosecutors finally realised they had got it wrong and agreed to drop the case against her.
Miss Jones’s ordeal began shortly before midnight on June 16 last year when she and a friend went to a shop near her home in Edge Hill, Liverpool, to buy some Coca-Cola.
Another customer, a drunken woman, became aggressive when the assistant refused to serve her, and attacked Miss Jones and her friend when they intervened.
Both girls were stamped on and suffered severe bruising.
When police arrived the attacker had fled, and Miss Jones was crying and hysterical. Despite her protestations, police assumed she had been drinking and arrested her.
‘At the police station, a doctor confirmed she hadn’t been drinking, but still the police tried to pursue her through the courts.

Other than being a salutary lesson in not intervening, you have to wonder why the police ignored a doctors evidence that the young lady wasn’t drunk. Even at the end though the CPS only dropped the case because they had insufficient evidence to prove she was drunk, not because they had it wrong.

The police even had the nerve to try and get her to admit her guilt by a £60 fixed penalty fine rather than accept the evidence that the young lady had autism and was not drunk at all.

Don’t get me wrong here, I know it isn’t easy being a plod and that they do get an awful lot of crap thrown them during their work, but really at times they simply do not help themselves. I’m still a bit mystified as to why they arrested her in the first place as she was the one who’d been assaulted. But have ran across the arrest first sort it out mentality from other reports of police actions in recent years to know just how some of them operate.

Now I realise we only have the mothers statement that there was a doctor, but the lack of evidence proving she was drunk does suggest that a doctor was there, after all, it’s a simple test to prove you have been taking alcohol.

Perhaps the length of time was adjudged punishment enough for involving the police?

Either way, I doubt she’ll trust them any more or get involved in future.

2 comments for “Injustice

  1. January 28, 2013 at 3:30 pm

    I often get told I’m ‘anti police’ because I highlight stories like this. I’m not.

    Or rather, I’m very pro-police when they DO THEIR JOB and not when they go all out, balls to the wall to either avoid doing their job or to excuse and cover up being CAUGHT not doing their job…

    It seems that, these days, even when the injured party does their job for them, they still don’t want to know:

    Do we get the police we deserve? I don’t know. I do know neither of these people deserved this.

  2. January 28, 2013 at 9:13 pm

    Surely, yet another example of “The Punishment is the Process”.

    The problem here I suspect is not the facts of the case, but rather than the police got so far up their own arse before stopping to check that they couldn’t easily back down.

    Once a plod has arrested someone and charged them with drunken disorderly or whatever then that plod better get a fine, caution or charge out of it otherwise he/she will be in deep doodoo and facing possible action for unlawful arrest (as would seem to be the case here).

    If, they’d managed to get this poor girl to accept the £60 fixed penalty fine, then it’s unlikely any of this would be coming out. Instead it would be the usual bollocks of:-

    “A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police would only confirm that a teenage girl accepted a £60 fixed penalty fine in relation to drunkenness. We cannot comment further on individual cases.”.

Comments are closed.