Pretty maids all in a row

new pearl harbour

What is wrong with this picture?

The picture is of the five first line US nuclear carriers docked together in one place. Just like Battleship Row, Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941.

This picture was taken the other day in Norfolk, Virginia. The Obama Administration ordered 5 nuclear carriers into harbor for “routine” (?) inspections. Heads of the Navy were flabbergasted by the directive but had to comply as it was a direct order from their Commander of Deceit.

The carriers were all pulled out from the MIDDLE EAST and the Afghanistan support role, leaving our land forces naked and exposed!

NORFOLK, VA. (February 8, 2013). This is the first time since WWII that five nuclear powered aircraft carriers were docked together.USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), USS Enterprise (CVN 65), USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), and USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) are all in port at Naval Station Norfolk, VA., the world’s largest naval station.

Knowledgeable sources stated that this breached a long standing military protocol in the Navy meant to avoid a massive enemy strike on major US forces. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Ryan J. Courtade/Released). Obama is Commander in Chief. This ordering of most of the Navy’s capitol ships into one place is unprecedented since Pearl Harbor! This could be the creation of a false flag atomic incident too stupid for any enemy to pass up.



10 comments for “Pretty maids all in a row

  1. amfortas
    March 24, 2013 at 9:34 am

    King O’Barmy has spoken. And none of the Chiefs of the Navy stand up and say, “Are you SEERIUZ ? ! Are you friggin’ NUTS, Mr President?”

    He didn’t decide to do this all by himself. Look for the power behind his Throne. Mind you, when every State and Department of State at Federal level has dozens of bureaucrats earning half as much again as a four stripe Admiral, what sort of quality of Integrity can we expect. The military has been mollicoddled in mediocrity for a decade.

    But there is a silver lining. The Americans have been stomping around the world making enemies of friends and nonebrity countries for so long that a fleet of carriers ten times as big is not going to be enough no matter where they are positioned. They were not necessary while Hilary was the Secretary of State, using all of her superior female communication skills and conflict resolution capabilities. She was busy turning the world into a village in the best interests of the children, and they were sailing here and sailing there, launching planes to bomb the village wells. And now when she is tired from all that womyn’s work, the ships are just plain worn out.

    She has tidied them away.

    And the village idiot gets the blame.

    Just you wait until she has put her feet up for a few minutes and had a coffee and a chat with her girlfriends on the phone.

    (Sarcasm, by the way)

    • March 24, 2013 at 4:34 pm

      I was sent a supposed debunking of this at but looking closely at it and all its False! and so on, it simply confirms Obama did do this. Post scheduled tomorrow.

    • mona
      March 24, 2013 at 5:51 pm

      Oblimey does not need aircraft carriers in the midwest, the DHS needs to pay for the two billion rounds of ammo for the impending civil war,

  2. Derek
    March 24, 2013 at 5:53 pm

    I am old enought to remember the armchair admirals holding their hands up in horror when the Royal Navy lost it’s last battleship. Meanwhile the real admirals knew that the battleship was obsolete. I ask if the concept of large aircraft carriers is now just as obsolete. The tasks of carrier bourne aircraft are to protect the fleet, and to project power ashore, mainly to protect a seabourne invasion. The US has at least ten large carriers, with 5 in dock, she still has ample to carry out any task required.

    • March 24, 2013 at 6:10 pm

      That’s the issue – where the threat will come from and in which form.

      • Derek
        March 24, 2013 at 6:36 pm

        Surely, the issue is can the US respond adequately to any threat from any source. The threat is not as important as the ability to repel it if or when it comes.

        • Rossa
          March 25, 2013 at 7:37 am

          Having 10 or more aircraft carriers certainly didn’t stop or repel the 9/11 attack, false flag or not.

          An aircraft carrier is a lot of overkill for carrying drones, the aerial response for the war against civilians. May also explain why we won’t need an aircraft carrier of our own eventually. Wouldn’t be surprised if the RAF gets wound down to next to nothing in the end as we won’t be needing so many fighter jets when warfare is conducted more like a computer game from a bunker anywhere in the world.

          • Furor Teutonicus
            March 25, 2013 at 12:48 pm

            That is like saying having Trident did not prevent Northern Ireland!

            Totaly different concepts.

            The carrier fleet is to support troops ashore, as in Afghanistan, to protect the invasion fleet (wherever) AND to be able to launch an air stike ANYWHERE on the globe at shortest possible notice… North Korea, China, Russia…..

  3. Furor Teutonicus
    March 25, 2013 at 12:40 pm

    XX This is the first time since WWII that five nuclear powered aircraft carriers were docked together.XX

    No WRONG!

    They did not HAVE Nuclear aircraft carriers in WWII.

  4. Furor Teutonicus
    March 25, 2013 at 12:42 pm

    And, unless my eyes are playing tricks, there are SIX in that photo.

Comments are closed.