Waste of time

Now I don’t like child abusers, both mental, sexual and physical, unlike the current justice system we have in the UK my own preferred methods would be quick and permanent for those who abused beyond reasonable disciplinary bounds for physical abuse with the same applied to sexual abuse of a clear minor. Naturally I’d approach said justice with the use of common sense and not precedent nor would I be in support of any waste of time methods used simply to garner votes.

In my eyes it would have to work…


Leading search engine companies Google and Microsoft have agreed measures to make it harder to find child abuse images online.
As many as 100,000 search terms will now return no results that find illegal material, and will trigger warnings that child abuse imagery is illegal.
PM David Cameron has welcomed the move but said it must be delivered or he would bring forward new legislation.
Child protection experts have warned most images are on hidden networks.
In July, Mr Cameron called on Google and Microsoft’s Bing – which together account for 95% of search traffic – to do more to prevent people getting access to illegal images.

The part in bold is the crux of the matter, considering how Google (at least) scans everything you type into it in order to target you for adverts (Note, if you’re getting something for free, chances are you aren’t a recipient, but a product, and sold as such) Does anyone else here suspect that those who wish to look at images of child abuse are not going to use Google or Bing? Hell I even expect that they aren’t (if they are smart) using a mainstream browser or operating system either.

In essence this is probably simply a method by the two search engine operators to prevent idiots like Cameron coming up with stupid legislation to cripple their operations. You can almost see the mission creep from such legislation creeping into other areas such as MP scandals etc with the introduction at a later date of addendum’s to the original bill. After all, look at the abuse of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 since it was introduced to combat terrorism. It’s been used to check on abuse of school catchment areas, improper use of recycling bins, neighbourhood disputes etc.

The government knows that any move to combat child abuse will be popular, the problem is that the government can’t be trusted to not add to any such moves.

You can bet if the two search engine operators fail to do as the government wants that such legislation will be waiting in the wings.

You can bet it will be popular.

You can bet it won’t work as planned.

You can bet that it will be expanded into other areas the government doesn’t want us to look at…


6 comments for “Waste of time

  1. Dave_G
    November 18, 2013 at 6:16 pm

    Yup, it was the previous sentence that worries me – “PM David Cameron has welcomed the move but said it must be delivered or he would bring forward new legislation.”

    In other words they KNOW it isn’t going to work and they couldn’t CARE LESS that it isn’t going to work as it’s the ‘new legislation’ he wants implemented and this obvious set-up-to-fail idea is the ways and means of achieving it.

    You have been warned.

    • November 18, 2013 at 6:27 pm

      What he said. This isn’t even intended to work, it’s just a first step towards regulation with a way to blame Google and Bing.

      It won’t even be the government who calls for legislation, it will be ‘campaigners’. The government will ‘reluctantly’ agree.

  2. John
    November 18, 2013 at 6:57 pm

    Look we have Internet policy in the hands of a cretin who thought that “LOL” meant ‘lots of love’

    With the bar set as low as that you should not be surprised. I just hope that this fuckwit understands nuclear weaponry better than his Googles.

    In his defence he is more intelligent than Clegg but that’s about all Cameron has for defence.

  3. qaqwex
    November 18, 2013 at 9:59 pm

    I too fear mission creep, I would be surprised if the great and the good don’t do so. I do not know how to get hold of child pornographers and neither do I want to know but it would be a delicious irony if the words conservative, Tory and labour were adopted by the paedo cesspit as code words for child porn.

  4. Voice of Reason
    November 19, 2013 at 1:24 am

    Pre-internet, the US Postal Service were the country’s largest purveyor of kiddie pron, mostly in an effort to catch predators.

  5. Furor Teutonicus
    November 20, 2013 at 1:28 am

    Commyron appears to be a bit of an expert in this field.

    Any one from Scotland yard taken a look at HIS computer record?

Comments are closed.