La Manif pour tous

Massive demo in Paris:

manif pour tous

Firstly, who are they?

The French must stand up…”Mariage pour tous” (“Marriage for all”) is same-sex “marriage” imposed on all!

The “Mariage pour tous” bill wreaks havoc on the Civil Code, replacing the words “husband” and “wife”, “father” and “mother” by unisex, undifferentiated terminology (notable “parents”). This bill intends to erase sexual differentiation and complementarity from the law and jeopardize the foundation of human identity: sexual difference and the resulting structure of parentage. It paves the way for a new, “social” parentage unrelated to human reality. It creates a framework for a new anthropological order founded not on sex but on gender, that is, sexual preference.

“Mariage pour tous” is the end of genealogy for all !

With plenary adoption for two men or two women, children will be considered, by law, born of two parents of the same sex, thus willingly deprived of a father or a mother. They will be deprived of half their origins. This is profoundly discriminatory and unjust for children.

They organized a demonstration in Paris against gay “marriage”, to which the socialists [PS] said:

In a statement, the first secretary of the PS denounces “the manipulations and lies on which a reactionary fringe trying to cement opposition to government policy, with the support of several irresponsible parliamentary UMP”.

Reactionary “fringe”, eh?

small fringe

Some Reactionary “fringe”. There was a poll on the socialist attempt to force this bill through, as Cameron did. It asked if you agree with the socialists that it should go through and protests were out of order. In other words, was being anti gay “marriage” wrong:

poll on manif pour tous

Think that’s fairly clear – the French people want no part of this. It’s something pushed by the socialists and gay mafia only.

Now, if it is such a large protest in Paris, then it will be in all the papers over here for days, will it not?

Just checking now. N-n-n-n-o-o-o-o-o. Nothing. Not a sausage. Well, whodathunk it? Now if it had been for gay “marriage”? Every headline in the world.

Will the socialists and gay mafia ever take the hint?

Meanwhile, over here, a criminal social worker or whoever approves these things has approved two lesbians being given an orphaned Muslim child to do as they wish with.

That person and whoever wrote that code need to be behind bars.

8 comments for “La Manif pour tous

  1. john in cheshire
    February 2, 2014 at 7:20 pm

    James, I’m in a quandary because my gut belief is that the only way to defeat evil is to kill it. However, I keep asking myself, in a biblical New Testament sense, what is the proper way to combat this evil. I’m afraid that apart from their removal from our world, I can’t come up with an answer. Is there one, in your opinion?

  2. February 2, 2014 at 7:45 pm

    We’d have done it if there was an obvious solution.

    What I liked about Paris was that so many were so vociferous so many ordinary men and women, including the young. Over here, you still encounter this sort of let’s all be equal thing as a justification when the issue is nothing to do with equality in the least. It’s almost as though we’re brain dead over here.

    And as for that “adoption” which may have been what you were referring to mainly – these people are ensconced, they seem to be immune from us getting to them.

    • Simone
      February 3, 2014 at 12:30 pm

      Surprise surprise, the Islamic hoards have been ‘protesting’ and TPTB are ‘rethinking their decision’. Fcuking cowards (and I am anti gay adoption btw).

      All references to this protest have been erased from the Daily Mail and Mirror stories and can only be found by using ‘somali protest child lesbian couple’ as a search term, which brings this up at the Mirror:

      ‘Muslim family hit out after ‘social services choose white lesbian couple to adopt daughter’ ‎- by Natalie Evans ‎- 22 hours ago
      The Somali family say they were told there were. … social services chose a white lesbian couple to adopt their young daughter, it emerged today. … But the farewell was postponed when around 50 people protested outside …’

      Nothing about a protest in the article now though.

      However, the gay ‘pink news’ has the full thing:

  3. February 2, 2014 at 9:26 pm

    It is also about the closing factories in Brittany and, related to your topic, ‘gender theory’ — not just sex education, but gender roles taught in schools. Some started with Sarkozy but Hollande’s administration extended this.

    I did hear a woman who helped to organise this march say on RMC the other day that it was not specifically about homosexual ‘marriage’ but other topics — e.g. Hollande’s government’s move against the traditional family unit, their lack of influence against unemployment and corporate (and foreign) investment — that this march attempted to protest.

    She was adamant that it was not about single-sex marriage, even though the interviewer said it was — which your site points out, so I don’t know. I do know that last week’s was about all the above and more — for all intents and purposes, a denunciation of Hollande’s administration.

    To John in Cheshire — I realise this was addressed to James, but, for what it’s worth, here are a few relevant NT verses:

    1 Corinthians 6:9-11 (St Paul):

    ‘Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.’

    Romans 1:26-27 (St Paul):

    ‘Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.’

    Jude 1:7:

    ‘The people of Sodom and Gomorrah and the towns around them also did evil things. They gave themselves over to sexual sins. They committed sins of the worst possible kind. They are an example of those who are punished with fire. The fire never goes out.’

    So, if one remains unrepentant, there are divine penalties to face. Much of these relate to unbelief in general, which brings on the sin.

    According to the letters of Sts Peter and John (the Divine, author of the eponymous Gospel as well as Revelation), there is little one of us can do other than warn of the consequences. Unbelievers also fall under the judgement on the Last Day.

  4. mona
    February 3, 2014 at 9:08 am

    An agenda to literally replace Western civilisation has been running for a while now, Cameron did not put gay marriage in the Conservative party manifesto? he knew it was on the agenda why did he keep it a secret?. Target the nuclear family, examine the roots and associations of our politicians, how someone as corrupt as Blair could still be free?, who and what is Milliband his origins, who really made him leader of Labour? and Clegg–yuk, why mass immigration will never stop?. what is Agenda 21, Codex Alimentarius?, the burden of the EU, the Protocols? how is the USS Liberty connected to all this

  5. DICK R
    February 3, 2014 at 9:37 am

    This will make it impossible for any child adopted by perverts to trace his real family , and to pretend that the same perverts are capable of procreation is a profound and deliberate nonsense.

  6. Ed P
    February 3, 2014 at 5:08 pm

    Surely a child unable to trace his or her DNA is in danger of unknowingly forming a relationship with a sibling? Inbreeding is inadvisable – see “certain village cultures” for the obvious physical and mental degradations which result.

  7. February 4, 2014 at 9:48 am

    Bottom line here, for Hollande, Cameron et al, is nothing to do with who’s right or wrong on the issue, whether we’re homophobic or they’re familyphobic. The bottom line is that there is widespread opposition and the PTB and media are combining to hide that there is.

    There’s the first crime before we even begin on the rights or wrongs of the actual issue.

Comments are closed.