What began in November of 1988 as an investigation by the FBI and IRS of a black man named Larry King, who was the president of the Franklin Credit Union in Omaha, Nebraska for millions in missing funds, soon led to the exposure of a child abuse/sex slave ring that involved some of the most prominent community leaders in Omaha.
This included the former publisher of the Omaha World Herald, the then Chief of Police, the society editor of the Omaha World Herald, a former state senator, the head of the Nebraska Forestry Service, and the multi-millionaire heir to the Brandeis Department fortune.
Approximately 80 youngsters came forward and made allegations concerning sexual abuse, forced prostitution, and cult activities.
The closing of ranks was like the closing of a steel vault door. A new syndrome was invented – False Memory Syndrome. Over the next decade, every one of those principals who’d set up that foundation were either charged themselves or had some other dodgy further activity sheeted home to them. You can research that one under False Memory Syndrome debunked.
While it’s certainly a sticky wicket relying on child testimony made to clinical psychologists, a point seized on by the FMS people, it did result in one conviction and many involved at the time at least half-believe today the Alisha Owen and Paul Bonacci version, as well as noting the disappearance of Johnny Gosch.
The reason so-called rationalists [or the closed-minded] so roundly rejected any of it at the time is that it brought in things like Bohemian Grove and used a word that one cannot use in any blogpost without being laughed out of the sphere – satanic. Doesn’t matter if a bunch of High Masons have a ceremony in which they bleed a goat or whatever – the word is a no-no. Doesn’t matter about the Knights Templar or that the Queen is a Welf or any of that – you cannot use that “s” word.
The difference was that there were convictions in that case, interrelationships between various members of the great and the good were established, it prompted public demonstrations of hundreds of thousands in Belgium. It was better documented in court and accepted than either of the Franklin or McMartin cases.
Then we can go to another one which OoL and my site have been on about for years – first seen in our sphere by blogger Prodicus – the distribution by the German Health authorities of a pamphlet, printed by Bertelsmann, with whom Merkel has a close relationship, in which parents were encouraged to have sexual contact with their toddlers.
In the last few weeks, we saw similar in Canada and as long as we look at all of these “incidents” as one-offs, we’ll never get the bigger picture. Not even the NHS and care-home scandals will sheet it home to the apologists and indulgers in it.
It’s always gone on. Let me name an airport – Omaha Air force base – which has been subject to many allegations of the trading of children over the years for the great and the good. I mean, why the incredulity? Hasn’t slavery been around since Roman times and before? What about the southern European trade in girls – or do all those Poles and Hungarian girls on porn sites just pop up of their own volition and trade around the world?
And so to our own home-grown affair, finally seeing the light of day:
I’ve been sent some material [thanks] which adds to this:
So there are some readers saying to themselves – amazing, never would have thought it and tinfoil hatters like me saying you only need look at things as diverse as Salon Kitty in Germany to Joy Division to the revelations of Svali to the wealth of documented evidence on these people.
And as for cover-ups, this country is a master at it – from David Kelly to 7/7, Diana, Blair’s WMD – it goes on and on – Hillsborough. My question is – why the incredulity? We already have no respect for pollies at Westminster – do we really think they’ll genuinely investigate this beyond the usual Hutton or whatever the enquiry will be called?
Well worn paths, these are.
Blogger and Tweeter Daniel Hendy has written on this matter in a letter:
I look forward to the upcoming statement today in the House of Commons regarding investigating historic allegations of abuse.
Will you please consider your own involvement in any investigation. There is testimony in this publicly available interview (link below) which strongly suggests Special Branch and MI5 had information concerning routine and abhorrent cases of abuse; only a senior elected member of the cabinet can get to the bottom of such accusations, I therefore am emailing to implore you to make sure; and make widely public any evidence that might have been covertly obtained (possibly for purposes of investigation other than those pertaining to child abuse) be included and allowed to be considered for this inquiry.
Any public, expert or judge led investigation can not satisfactorily investigate up these channel effectively. You must show leadership and decree that this information come to light, and then follow up and ensure that your orders are followed in full.
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORU5x-ryedU
The alleged activities at Elm Guest House do not seem to have fully come to light and to the average observer there appears to be a conspiracy of silence from within the British Establishment. It is hard to imagine that any more serious charge could be laid on the doorstep of HM Government and Police and Security Services.
Could I implore further that sunlight is the best disinfectant. At the heart of this are allegations of the grotesque behavior of human beings. Any historic cover-ups must be uncovered, and no subsequent cover-ups of information acceptable. Nothing less than full disclosure is in my humble opinion acceptable.
I trust you will act now openly and in the best interests of the people of the United Kingdom.
UK citizen (living abroad)
As Daniel indicated, the PM’s being asked to investigate something close to home: “Only a senior elected member of the cabinet can get to the bottom of such accusations”.
Where does that leave, us, the common people?
Up that well known creek without a paddle. For if this is indeed what all the indicators say it is – a globally repeated affair – don’t forget the Jersey and Irish paedo cases – then anyone causing trouble is between a rock and a hard place. If this post and the plethora of blogposts out there get nowhere, then we’ll continue to bleat on and the hats will continue to be tinfoil.
But if anyone heeds this and realizes the extent of the rot at the top, in specific terms, then I’d not like to predict the future of any who bang on about it. There is a point, when the Guidos of this world get behind it, the Michelle Malkins, the HuffPosts [though they’re probably the last ones to bother], the Breitbarts, Anonymous and others – that it crosses a very dangerous line for Them.
The tribal voters will take a lot but they won’t put up with this sort of thing if it comes out in all its lurid detail.
At the moment this post goes out, comment on the matter is still not sub judice. When it becomes so, we might have to close comments.