Apocalypse America soon?

Hell of a lot on US politics today, haven’t even got to the budget over here.

Rossa sends a bit of speculation that Obama will do a Putin and stay in power. On the surface, absolute rubbish of course and all Kool-Aid drinkers, including our two left-leaning ladies who comment here, would not accept the scenario.

Nor did I until I read into it a bit more. One of the commenters:

I read this: [up to 2013]

“Boykin referred to recent reports that Obama has purged some 197 officers in the past five years.

These reports suggest these officers were suspected of disloyalty or disagreed with the Obama administration on policy or force-structure issues. As Boykin pointed out, a number of them have been relieved of duty for no given reason.”

They’ve certainly changed America into a form they wish to make the takeover complete but I read it the way of American Thinker in an earlier post where they said he [or they behind him] are ensuring the things are in place to continue his policies and influence. Change the POTUS but hardly anything changes.

Another:

Has the coup already happened? My answer is, it’s coups all the way down. I.e., it’s always coups.

I wrote earlier about the possibility of Chelsea Clinton being prepped. Whether she is “viable” or not, she is clearly prepped to run at some point. They may have been planning her for 2024, but now they may be looking at moving her up to 2016. Or as Gail suggested, Hillary may have been a diversion or placeholder, which suggests 2016 may have been their plan for Chelsea all along.

One thing is indisputable here. The object of all these machinations by the present White House is singular: to obliterate anything resembling a viable opposition to Communism. Once that’s done, then, in their view, they can return to “business as usual”.

There does seem some evidence:

New York Democratic Rep. Jose Serrano reintroduced a bill in Congress on Friday to repeal the 22nd Amendment, which places term limits on the U.S. presidency.

The bill, which has been referred to committee, would allow Barack President Obama to become the first president since Franklin Roosevelt to seek a third term in office…..

http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/06/new-york-congressman-introduces-bill-to-abolish-presidential-term-limits/

He’s also hard at this:

1. By aggitating the blacks.
2. Setting up a ‘let’s you and he fight’ between blacks and cops
3. Calling normal Americans ‘Extremists’ link
4. Closing down up to 20% or more of US electric power (EPA’s WAR on COAL), while preventing nuclear and Natural Gas as alternates.

One disagrees:

I think you wrong. Too many of us good ole boys with firearms and the knowledge of how to use them. They can control many urban centers but not the country.

That’s the standard “don’t tread on me” line. I think they’re going to be in for a shock. The FEMA camps [posts passim] are no figment of the imagination [Denver Airport is another] and it’s been shown that when people are disarmed, they go like sheep. Nazis – Jews.

Obama is still a few years away from getting the states to disarm all citizens but it will reach a point where he or the people behind him will feel they can then act with relative impunity.

This is a cross-party initiative

We’ve been concentrating on Democrats pollies and Democratic voters as being the traitors and that’s so but it’s also the Republican pollies. It will take but a few quotes to show what the agenda has been now for a long time in Washington.

June 28, 1945 – President Truman endorses world government in a speech: “It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.”

October 24, 1945 – The United Nations Charter becomes effective.

July 1948 – Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s “Foreign Affairs,” sees “a New World Order” taking shape: “How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?”

Feb. 7, 1950 – International financier and CFR member James Warburg tells a Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it – by conquest or consent.”

Feb. 9, 1950 – The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution #66 which begins: “Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to provide a true world government constitution.” The resolution is introduced by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho), who later states: “We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support themselves.”

April 12, 1952 – CFR member John Foster Dulles [who later became Secretary of State, in speaking before the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, says: “Treaty law can override the Constitution. Treaties can take powers away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body, and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights.”

If you think that something written in those years was all part of a colorful past and there’s none of that any more, then you’re either naive or a left-liberal. It’s never altered.

1953 – Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, tells a Congressional commission investigating tax-exempt foundations: “We at the executive level here were active in either the OSS [forerunner of the CIA], the State Department, or the European Economic Administration.
During those times, and without exception, we operated under directives issued by the White House. We are continuing to be guided by just such directives, the substance of which were to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.”

Jenner I’ve oft quoted so won’t do so again.

1959 – “The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy” is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers’ Fund. It explains that the U.S. “cannot escape, and indeed should welcome…the task which history has imposed upon us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions – spiritual, economic, political, social.”

1961 – The U.S. State Department issues Document 7277, entitled “Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.” It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which “no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”

1962 – A study entitled “A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations” is published, in which CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield states: “…if the Communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.”

1962 – “The Future of Federalism” by Nelson Rockefeller claims that current events compellingly demand a “new world order.” He says there is: “A fever of nationalism…but the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks…These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order…Sooner perhaps than we may realize…there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.”

I know the criticism by the left plus good ole boy right of the CFR influence – oh they’re just a thinktank. Yep, a thinktank which got Bush, Martin and Fox to a meeting on March 23rd, 2005 to implement their idea of SPPNA [NAU]. Warburg quoted earlier was the Fed man and as Illuminati as any who’ve been identified, the Dulles Bros are known-knowns.

When will left-liberals and good ole boys wake up?

1966 – Professor Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University, authors a massive volume entitled “Tragedy and Hope” in which he states: “There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act.

In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so.

I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records.

I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies, but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

1970 – Zbigniew Brzezinski [who later became President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor] writes a book entitled “Between Two Ages.” He has nothing but praise for Marxism:

“Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision…Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief…Marxism, disseminated on the popular level in the form of communism, represents a major advance in man’s ability to conceptualize his relationship to the world.”

He also describes how war can be waged against a nation without its citizens even realizing they are under attack: “Technology will make available to the leaders of major nations a variety of techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of security forces need be appraised.

One nation may attack a competitor covertly…techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby weakening a nation’s capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the competitor.”

May 18, 1972 – In speaking of the coming world government, Roy M. Ash, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that: “…within two decades the institutional framework for a world economic community will be in place…and aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to a supernational authority.”

1973 – International banker and staunch member of the Council on Foreign Relations, David Rockefeller, founds a new organization called the Trilateral Commission. He invites future President Jimmy Carter to become one of the founding members. Zbigniew Brzezinski is the organization’s first director.

April 1974 – Former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateral and CFR member Richard Gardner’s article “The Hard Road to World Order” is published in the CFR’s “Foreign Affairs,” where he states that: “…the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

1975 – In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign “A Declaration of Interdependence,” which states that “we must join with others to bring forth a new world order…Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that obligation.” Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:

“It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a ‘new world order’ that would redistribute the wealth created by the American people.”

July 1977 – Jeremiah Novak’s article “The Trilateral Connection” appears in the “Atlantic Monthly”: “For the third time in this century, a group of American schools, businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a New World Order…”

Sept. 1980 – At a “Prelude to Victory” party given by Presidential candidate Ronald Reagan, Mr. Reagan is photographed with the place of honor, immediately to Reagan’s right, given to David Rockefeller, the leader of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission. Earlier in his campaign, Reagan had promised to shun the directions of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission. [CFR member William Casey became Reagan’s campaign manager and was later appointed CIA Director.

George Bush, member of both the Trilateral Commission and the CFR, was chosen as Ronald Reagan’s running mate. Cabinet members included Secretary of State Alexander Haig (CFR), Treasury Secretary Donald Regan (CFR), Commerce Secretary Malcolm Baldridge (CFR), and Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger (Trilateral Commission).

Ronald Reagan had also promised that he would cut spending and reduce the size of government, but once again rhetoric did not match reality. When Reagan took office the national debt stood at $935 billion. By the end of his second term it had almost tripled to $2,572 billion.]

1981 – Congressman Larry McDonald calls for comprehensive congressional investigation of the CFR and Trilateral Commission. Congress is urged to investigate these organizations.

1983 – Larry McDonald is killed along with 268 other passengers on Korean Air Lines (KAL) flight 007, shot down over Sakhalin Island in the Sea of Japan.

1986 – Feb 28, PM Olaf Palme of Sweden assassinated 1987 – Governor Bill Clinton of Arkansas visits Socialist Antonio Gramsci in Italy. When asked by an Italian newspaper if he is there to learn how to implement Socialist economic policies in the United States, Governor Clinton replies in the affirmative.

1987 – “The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change” is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. In it, author Arthur S. Miller says: “…a pervasive system of thought control exists in the United States…the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education…people are told what to think about…a new vision is required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions…a new Constitution is necessary.”

1992 – Los Angeles riots started from incident on Florence and Normandy. Many buildings professionally torched in military- style action. National Guard called out. Citizens introduced to FEMA as friend and ally to the public.

1995 – Federal building in Oklahoma City bombed. Government suggests possible link to patriot militia groups. Government begins media assault on patriot organizations and militia groups.

1997 – May 1, UK election, youngest ever PM, Tony Blair wins ( The “new” labor party , replaces John Smith who died suddenly ).

That’s as far as my list goes but would there be much different from 1997 to 2014, looking about and seeing what has happened, plus this post’s first half?

You can’t make people see things. There were no dots joined in this post’s second half, just what key figures in the US were quoted as saying. Just what does it take? Do you think Obama doesn’t want it to go on? The people behind him [mentioned above]?

And look at one of the two ladies who comment on American politics here – she’s an avowed socialist, abetting this. Why? Why does she want this human misery?

The Tea Party was genuine at rank and file level, just as UKIP is. The Kochs got in there and others hijacked it too from the GOP. DP and GOP are the same – they each have a place at Bohemian Grove in summer.

Now let’s look back at McCarthyism. The socialists would have been delighted at his red-neck witchhunts as he alienated everyone and burnt out.

But was he wrong? Past posts by me have looked at Hollywood, the doings in Laurel Canyon and Mulholland Drive, Hollywood is a festering cesspit – just look at Whitney Houston’s daughter of late.

So McCarthy was not essentially wrong, just unpleasant and overbearing.

And this is what has happened all the way along the line, from Larry McDonald back to Louis McFadden. Someone whistleblows – David Kelly – the Man spirits him away, life goes on and people keep living in their oblivion. China Syndrome? Manchurian Candidate?

Some of us know these things but who reads us and more importantly, who’s capable of thinking past tin foil hats that there might actually be something happening here?

11 comments for “Apocalypse America soon?

  1. john in cheshire
    March 18, 2015 at 7:55 pm

    Has anyone in the USA Congress or Senate ever approved or explained the purpose of the FEMA camps and all those coffins that are on YouTube, or the purpose of the billion plus rounds of ammunition that various Federal government organisations have purchased? And more to the point is the EU doing similar things?

  2. Hereward unbowed.
    March 18, 2015 at 8:25 pm

    Obama, the Chicago kid and steeped in the Joe Daley way of doing things [coercion, cronyism, gerrymandering and bribery] – to say the least is no upholder of any sort of democratic tradition or adhered to the method – ie the democratic process.
    Obama, you can see how he has railroaded his bonkers green agenda virtually bypassing congress and thus what the people think is ignored or not deemed to be important.

    With this man of Kenya, he loathes Britain almost as much as our own elite does – “the UK should remain in the EU he dictates”. Furthermore, as Obama hates having to squabble and beg for votes – superseding [usurp] the American democratic process – nothing could be more appealing to the Chicago Kid and lets face it – who could actually stop him, if he wanted – deemed it because it sure looks as though he is preparing the ground…………..

    a war against Putin the perfect pretext for rule by executive order?

  3. Viscount Rectum
    March 18, 2015 at 8:37 pm

    The USA has reached a point of madness, where everyone knows there are two men in the White House Barry Obama and his partner Michael, Sandy Hook,Boston Marathon all three super hoaxes, 911 the crime America swallowed hook line and sinker and cannot deal with. Mass immigration up from the south is for the same reason Europe suffers from it. Putin is an angel he could not hold a candle to the conspirators in the west, but then we have Blair, no wonder the Pope is talking of resigning, the world is drowning in evil.

  4. March 18, 2015 at 8:46 pm

    I’ve just been speculating on Twitter whether Congress could not bypass Obama now, pass legislation of their own, contact govts. as they did Iran, block anything he tried to pass? Although I doubt he has much more to wreck now.

  5. gregormendel
    March 18, 2015 at 11:17 pm

    Your paranoia is getting in the way of logic and facts. We now have more general officers than we did at the height of WW2. Our military is much smaller now, by the way.

    These general officers have their own limousines and motorcades, private chefs and gorgeous mansions. As a former enlisted soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan I am all for getting rid of the cruft. These generals are leeches and have completely failed over the last 20 years.

    Heck, read any book about officers during WW2 and you’ll soon discover that Generals were getting fired left, right, and center. And quickly! If they failed one time they were gone and a replacement was found.

    That is not how it works today. Generals are the equivalent of tenured professors. As a capitalist, I can not abide by such a wasteful group of people. I dislike Obama as much as the next guy but you are seriously missing the point.

    • March 19, 2015 at 6:49 am

      Your paranoia is getting in the way of logic and facts.

      Let’s look at this more logically and less belligerently. There’s a big table upon which facts are laid. If they turn out not to be facts, they are removed.

      What you have added is further facts [perhaps]. So they go onto that big board, and we stand beside that board, observing. Many facts don’t apparently gree but they still have to remain there. The ones I put up, counter to yours, do not negate yours, neither do your negate the ones I’d gathered.

      All of them need to be taken into account in working out a “most likely scenario”. That is how investigative work should work.

      you are seriously missing the point

      On the point of the generals, quite possibly and so we must adjust our view, rather than aggressively press on with a wonky point. On the point of Obama and the rest of it, not in the least – this is corroborated. It stays there on the big board, despite interests which would like to see it removed.

  6. Furor Teutonicus
    March 19, 2015 at 5:18 am

    XX ” It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which “no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”XX

    Hmm. Well that REALLY worked for the Versailles Diktat…. right?

    • March 19, 2015 at 6:53 am

      That’s a good point.

  7. James Strong
    March 19, 2015 at 7:31 am

    Some of this is bordering on insane, it may already have crossed that border.
    Chelsea Clinton was born in 1980.
    She would be 36 as a candidate for the Presidency in 2016, with no legislative or executive experience.

    Barack Obama will not be President for one minute past the inauguration of the new President in January 2017, as prescribed by the Constitution as it is today, 19 March 2015.. It is lunacy to suggest that he will hold on.

    How much would you like to bet, of your own money, that Chelsea Clinton will be the Democratic nominee in 2016? Or that Obama will try to stay on?

    Unfortunately, by putting forward this mad fantasy, you avoid the issue of how candidates emerge through the system of primaries. They come through a system where they are either put forward or attacked depending on how they fit in with the interests of power in the USA, and then the voters vote.
    There is no need for an office-holder to cling on because the next guy is not going to be a lot different.

    • Furor Teutonicus
      March 19, 2015 at 8:08 am

      XX you avoid the issue of how candidates emerge through the system of primaries.XX

      “You can have any colour you want, so long as it is black.”

      If you only allow candidates through to Primaries, that are “on the right wavelength” then “They” get the result they were wanting in the first place.

      If that were not the case, why are there only two parties in the U.S?

      You control the input, you control the output.

    • March 19, 2015 at 9:25 am

      Y-e-e-e-s-s-s, JS, think you’re confusing the messenger and the sender. How much of my money on Chelsea Clinton? I’d put a wager she’d not be. Just because some guy’s idea is quoted, doesn’t mean it’s supported by the blogger.

      On the other hand, I’ve just noticed now, having written that, that when this was run at my site, it was “American Apocalypse Now?” Over here, the question mark failed to be put in for some reason – must have been rushing. Therefore it does look like I might be suggesting the things quoted. So I’ll put the question mark in, as it was meant to be.

      Think FT’s idea that it’s a rigged game, preselection, is closer to the mark.

Comments are closed.