This is becoming increasingly bizarre, people leave country to go and fight with outfit that is fighting amongst others us and our government wants to give them a welcome pack when they return with a “don’t be a naughty boy again” lesson included that will be totally ignored, has anyone in power got a clue on any of this.
I’d agree they don’t have a clue but the people behind them, pulling their strings – they know full well that it’s a hop, step and a jump from “extreme views” meaning Islamic to also including this blog’s. It’s not as if it hasn’t been mentioned before. Them has been trying this for a long time – remember the no to ID campaign on the web? All the GCHQ issues?
And Wiggia himself refers to it here:
This is interesting, the stopping of lawful photographers going about their business is a well known modern phenomenon and the Terrorism Act is the crutch the Police use to do that, this is different in that the photojournalists were on the same bus as those going to the demonstration, what is it about labelling a group “far right” that makes the use of “Terrorism Laws” legal never mind the photojournalists, this is another classic example of the two tier use of the law, when busloads of Muslims descended on London a year ago with banners proclaiming all the usual threats to the nation and despoiled statues etc were any buses stopped under the same law, no I thought not, but a group wraps itself in the national flag and the Terrorism Act is trotted out to try and stop them.
Yep. Meanwhile, haiku questioned The Atlantic agreeing with Trump on Bush:
As he [Bush] is the creature of Them – the CFR and others – then no, he didn’t do what he should have to stop the evil muvvers but then again – he owed his position to Them so what could he do?
This blog has maintained, from Day 1, that there is a Them and Them control the agendas. There is so much evidence for the workings of Them, it comes out the whole time, whether or not mainstream people look at it. the left gets onto the banksters part of it but somehow misses on the rest.
Many people consistently refuse to believe that the govt would kill its own people, e.g. on 911, 7/7. What do you mean by govt? Obama, Blair, Cameron, Bush? I’d agree – no, they didn’t order the hit, if that’s what you mean.
The muvvers behind them though are an entirely different beast. These are the same people running the CIA. OK, Bourne was a fictional film but it sure wasn’t based on fiction. If you doubt the CIA’s capacity for these things, then look at ISIS [Operation Cyclone], look at G. Gordon Liddy. These are seriously lost people.
And that’s before we even get to the Round Table groups, the C300, the Tavistockers. It’s not even hard to take on board – look at Corbyn’s ideology, utterly devoid of any sense of reality, yet fervently adhered to. This is precisely the Mason thing, it’s the illuminati, it’s every other kook group. Could they bring down the WTC?
Of course they could – they believe this is the Stage 4 before the ultimate nirvana. Remember, as Wolfie once alluded to – these people see themselves as amazingly clever, their talk is clever. I’d add that it is Common Purpose speak – the whole idea that graduates are now the elite and fitted to “lead beyond authority”. This motif of the hidden controllers is constant.
It comes out in the UN having the unmitigated gall to tell all world govts – see today’s news – that they must legalize all drugs. Many will be amazed. I’m not, Harry [blogger and reader here too] is not amazed, Rossa would not be amazed – no one who actually follows this would be amazed. It’s par for the course.
People, this is world govt they’re talking about. I’ve a dozen quotes from people in govt I could drop in here now, some I have before, all working towards this so-called world govt. World religion too – World Council of Churches. Hence the Pope’s current guff. Unable to stomp on or stifle the belief of millions, they just railroad it through the physical, official church into this grey sludge of “world religion”.
Look at the current idiot of a bishop demanding we all bring in 50,000 migrants but will he house any in his mansion? Oh no, of course not. Look at the man’s picture – a typical useful idiot for Them.
As Alinsky and Benjamin said – it’s necessary to kill for the cause. Gerry Adams was quoted as saying killing was often necessary. Here’s the exact quote:
It might or might not be right to kill, but sometimes it is necessary. [Before the Dawn, 1966]
This is what is next to impossible to get through people’s brains – dear people, sweet people in other ways but oh so frustrating – that these evil muvvers do not operate as normal people do. Their minds are gone. They have the shell, the appearance of intelligent, articulate people but what comes out is bilge.
These are the pod people, quietly occupying all positions of note in society. There is precedent in Norway before Hitler attacked.
And yes, they can kill if they’re convinced that black is white and good is evil.
Go back to the OoL post on The Missing Children. There is a world-weary culture of ennui among the upper echelons of Europe which is seriously sick in the head. It comes out in the care home scandals here when it finally came out, it comes through Dolphin Square, it is a most definite theme running through Hillsborough.
It comes through in the mind control which still people are denying, despite MKUltra now being public arena and despite a conviction in the Franklin case and with Ewen Cameron in Canada.
Just read, look, explore it – these people are perfectly capable and the bunnies bearing the fallout will always be Blair and Obama, now Bush. This is the price for being the puppet leaders for some time, the Faustian bargain.
Not only is this one of the biggest U turns in history, but amazingly having cost the country and Europe gods knows what in cost and potential unrest she is still in her job !
She’s in power [and] backed by Bertelsmann and the Bruderheist. She’s their gal.
She’s an incompetent in herself, an ideologue who has never given it away – like Philby, Burgess and Maclean, once into this, they never give it away – and she is Them’s gal. All they need do is position her, in their everyday advice, to fail on something and suddenly she’s staring down the barrel of German wrath from the people.
These people, especially people like Cameron and Brown, are puppets.
Rossa comes in with a good article, not a bad summary but we both know that most will dismiss this. Someone wrote in comments the other day that it is never single pundits who sway events but sudden changes in mood of society faced with a threat.
In Merkel’s case, there is firstly that she was stitched up by her backers and secondly, that they knew this would change German opinion as nothing else could – the people had to be facing the stark threat, even though pundits had been warning about it for a very long time, almost completely ignored, just as this post will be.
Let me remind people of the issue, covered at OoL a number of times, of the German Health Department issuing pamphlets urging parents to love their toddlers sexually. I’ve provided the links many times, it was Bertelsmann who printed it.
Why did Merkel not step in and stop that? Easy – how could she? She is a creature of Bertelsmann and the Bruderheist. And I’d wager money that many of you are thinking “tinfoil hat” here. Why not explore and find out? If I can do it, you can. Trouble is, unless it was cached at the time on the web, it might not be there. but it’s still at OoL.
So to Rossa’s article she found. for the hardheaded, yes, the tone is breathless, full of the “everyone must be told” which sounds remarkably like my own tone above. That’s unfortunate, as it blunts the data. However, try to read through it as the substance is not wrong, it can be backed up, e.g. the UN’s global sustainability goals:
With those caveats, here is the article:
The global elite have never been closer to their goal of a united world. Thanks to a series of interlocking treaties and international agreements, the governance of this planet is increasingly becoming globalized and centralized, but most people don’t seem alarmed by this at all. In the past 30 days, we have seen some of the biggest steps toward a one world government, a one world economy and a one world religion that we have ever witnessed, but these events have sparked very little public discussion or debate.
From September 25th to September 27th, the United Nations launched a “new universal agenda” for humanity. Those are not my words, they actually come directly out of the core document for this new agenda. The Pope traveled to New York City to give the address that kicked off this conference, thus giving his considerable endorsement to this new plan. Virtually every nation on the entire planet willingly signed up for the 17 goals that are included in this plan, but this stunning turn of events made very few international headlines.
The United Nations is promising that if we all work together that we can turn our planet into some kind of “utopia”, but the truth is that all of this talk about “unity” masks a very insidious agenda.
Agendas are tinfoil hat? Look up Agenda 21.
For the general population, “the 2030 Agenda” has been rebranded as “the global goals”. On September 26th, some of the biggest names in the music world (including Beyonce) promoted these new “global goals” at the “Global Citizen Festival” that was held in Central Park. And you can watch a YouTube video where some of the most famous names on the entire planet urge all of us to get behind these new “global goals” right here.
None of this is by accident. We are being trained to think of ourselves as “global citizens” that belong to a “global community”. Decades ago, most Americans would have been up in arms over something like this. But now most people just seem to accept these changes passively.
And do you want to know who pushed really hard to give Obama fast track negotiating authorityso that these negotiations could be brought to a successful conclusion?
It was the traitorous Republican leadership in Congress. They did everything that they could to pave the way for Obamatrade.
Pope Francis clearly believes that Christians and Muslims worship the exact same God. And so that helps to explain why he authorized “Islamic prayers and readings from the Quran” at the Vatican for the first time ever back in 2014.
We can argue about whether they’ll ever achieve such goals. The hardheaded reader will point out that these people are essentially incompetent and couldn’t run anything, see anything through. I’m not disputing that but I am saying that this is very much their push and they feel they’re very close.
Ad it does cause damage. Exhibit 1: Kyoto. Exhibit 2: EU directives, plus the ECHR. On this blog we covered, a few years back, the Canadian court of Human Rights and Jennifer Lynch, taken on by Ezra Levant.
People, we are most certainly up against it and half the issue is that we have not read up and familiarized ourselves with the state of play.