Insanity is insidious – madness is catching

The word madness is much abused in its usage – everyone from the smallest child upwards uses it for something either good or bad, the English euphemize it as eccentricity.  There’s a post on the old blog about Wallace and Gromit and how necessary such madness is.

What I’d suggest and many others have seen it too, is that there’s a form of madness which is gradually taking over people’s thought processes.  Behind the Veil [commenter] on one of the many madnesses at large today, in this case, transgender, but it applies more widely:

This whole thing is a madness that will not end well. I often think in moments like this of a scene in Schindler’s List in which a young Nazi is supervising the mass burning of bodies. In it he turns around with a roar / cry from deep within.

It’s ambiguous as to whether its a rush of blood lust or whether it’s a cry of man who realises he has lost his mind and his humanity in the world that surrounds him.

That’s us I often think.

Rossa had this to say [my bold typeface]:

Remember that modern dating thing you dipped into. I recall the bit where someone said that the younger adults today all go out to a bar in a mixed group and then…..disappear into their phones! They don’t interact between themselves apart from the basics like “what do you want to drink”. 

The Muslim invasion is only one part of the story, there is also this massive migration of people into virtual reality. That’s also why we aren’t prepared to fight for our culture I the real world. You could suggest that it’s also been transferred online. 

See, here we are, all of us readers and bloggers, drawing distinctions between left and right, PC and normal, invader and indigenous, libertarian and Statist – Bezmenov in the 80s had this to say:

The result? The result you can see … the people who graduated in the 60s, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, and educational systems. You are stuck with them. You can’t get through to them. They are contaminated.

They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern [alluding to Pavlov]. You cannot change their minds even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior.

In other words [for] these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To rid society of these people you need another 15 or 20 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of United States [or any] society.

[The aim is] to “change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that – despite the abundance of information – no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”

This multi-stage process requires media complicity/mediocrity, control of educational policy, widespread corruption in politics and industry, and the unlimited money/credit of the international bankers.

Even here we’re not getting far, as seemingly rational people come in with seemingly cogent arguments, e.g. from Maria Miller, and push an insanity, something which no rational government ever pushed before.

This is the key – that no rational government, before these four decades, ever tried to redefine such things.  Sure they spent profligately, if Labour, on grandiose social schemes, or went austere if Tory, there was the bedroom tax and poll tax, even the window tax – but these qualify as rational and oppressive, whereas the intrusion into private lives now and the crimes against children have not been officially condoned in earlier society as they are today.

The ubiquitousness of hardcore porn is misdiagnosed.  It’s not just men who’ve always, for millennia, availed themselves of prostitutes and have viewed images – Pietro Aretino in the Renaissance is testimony to that. But now, every child has access, has ways.  The madness of the times is not in children doing that – hell, we did that in childhood whenever someone brought his dad’s pics to school – but in the sheer percentages these days, the overwhelming numbers.

We are Legion.

The numbers approach 100% on that, they approach 60 to 70% on political correctness, the number of rapes by immigrants approach what percentage?

And there is no sudden and severe backlash – there is just accommodation of it, except by people writing posts such as this and those commenting in kind.  There are mealy-mouthed rationalizations from so-many others – don’t you believe in fairness and equality, James, in loving one another?

There’s a theory from the dawn of time in lore that a certain beautiful angel took exception to one we’ll call God, seemingly over the creation of this creature called Man, having powers equal or greater in some cases to that angel, a certain divine spark, there was war in heaven, he got tossed out of heaven and hit earth with his followers and went mad with rage and jealousy, determining there and then that he would destroy humanity any which way.

Call that lore mad if you like but it’s a pretty good explanation for why policies and solutions coming down from above are insane in their nature, unsustainable for humanity if it’s to survive.  A simple definition of insane is holding a view which cannot be sustained in terms of the genuine welfare of Man.

And like the Eloi continuing to be kidnapped for the consumption of the Morlocks, there is no way, as Bezmenov says above, that anyone seems to be able to reverse this, there is certainly little political will to do so.

Behind the Veil, here on the climate scam but once again, applying more broadly:

I cannot name the year I became suspicious, but that I have certainly become. The key has become the politicisation of it all especially the efforts to airbrush the counter argument out of it all.

If it were so self evident it would be simple to demolish and the climate scientists would be confident in their knowledge to debate it out of the room but for some reason, they don’t seem to be and their argument is to call for the suppression of such discussion.

I wish I could find it but I once read an article in which someone described the PR origins of the much used phrase “the science is settled” which is in such prevalent use.

The issue for me is that we really can no longer have an honest debate on the issue. If the argument is in fact true, it has been too heavily compromised, especially by its proponents who have been repeatedly caught at the lies, the scheming and the manipulation.

Yes, when it does come out in the open, then the hollowness of the madness we’re seeing becomes apparent, even to now-former devotees.  There was a post up earlier today on a young SJW who wakes up – and why he wakes up, this is critical – here is a sample:

Changing was a long process. I initially got into SJW groups sort of through popularity- feminism was supposed to be THE thing for equality, and I wanted everyone to be treated well, so I joined a bunch of feminist forums, which branched into more garden variety SJW circles. Initially I had no idea there was a dark side to it.

I had some weird views before; I think in a lot of ways I was a stereotypical white knight. I was depressed at the time, and being applauded for being progressive definitely was an ego boost. Fighting people I perceived as bigoted made me feel better about myself.

My SJW tendencies were based mostly out of self loathing- I felt weird, like an outcast, had never had a girlfriend, hated myself, and thought that I was fixing myself by jumping deep into feminism. I armed myself with a lot of bad statistics (like the 1 in 4 rape stat) and felt smart because of it.

After a while it becomes second nature; you just sort of convince yourself that you’re on the right side and see your opponent as a stereotype out of reflex. That can happen here too, but SJW’s actively encourage it. You become utterly convinced that you’re part of an elite, enlightened group fighting an aging generation of uneducated racists and sexists.

But eventually I started to realize that I had incomplete information. I lost a lot of arguments to people I’d stereotyped as being dumb. The people I called allies just jumped to ad hominem attacks and semantic arguments, and that made them secure in their beliefs. That’s how they operate; when they lose, their mental gymnastics aren’t supposed to convince you. It’s to convince themselves, to justify not changing their sources or beliefs. And it’s very effective at that. It worked for me for a while.

But eventually it wasn’t enough for me. I started trying to revise feminist arguments with new, accurate sources. I’d correct people on my own side on forums and whatnot. They hated that, and jumped right to calling me a rape apologist and a woman hater. I was blown away, it contradicted my notion that we were the logical side.

I still find it funny that, though most of the class started out conservative and was roped into SJW mentalities, I started out SJW and by the end of the class it had practically ruined feminism for me. Because I’d been a part of it before. I knew when the professor was wrong. I knew how hollow the “peace and acceptance” spiel they preached was. I knew the counter points to their sources.

It felt like a bad joke to me at the time; I knew how my classmates felt, I’d felt the same way months earlier. But I was powerless to actually explain that to anyone, they just demonise and talk in circles until the argument goes away. As I had done months earlier.

At first I felt bad, ashamed, for going against everything. I wanted to be convinced again, I wanted to be a good SJW again. And all of a sudden I realized it wasn’t going to get better. I was in a university class about feminism, overrun with SJW’s, and they had worse arguments than I’d seen online.

There was no smarter next level to feminism that I was just too stupid to see. That was it. I was at the top and our arguments still sucked.

But if one does wake up and try to fight, that’s factored in too.  I’ve a mate who says it’s going to end in violence. And I replied – just as it’s meant to, just as they’re trying to get us to. Blogger Restoring Britain touches on that:

“But it’s morphed into something far more sinister that has nothing to do with equality ”

I have long held the view that those who start revolutions should be wary. Whilst they might have high minded principles, history teaches us that pretty much every one of these has had something more sinister waiting in the wings to sweep these aside for a different set of ends altogether. The Arab Spring showed us this in more recent years. Feminism was no different.

The ones to blame – the clever game

Calling Fire in a crowded theatre when there is none – impossible to apportion blame.

It’s not as if it’s an unknown, it’s been used as plots for films for how long?  The Quiet American was one such, an episode of Perry Mason another.  The loosening of Nigel Farage’s wheel bolts another. Unable to be sheeted home, no direct murder in it, just something attributable to negligence and incompetence.  Incompetence is the best cover for such doings. Behind the Veil again:

I once saw it said of such people that they are the type to shout ” fire” in a crowded theatre and when people get killed in the stampede deny it had anything to do with them. In the same vein I think it will be this group who having deserted their social justice mascot for a new one will write articles about us evil swine that cautioned against it from the off.

Who is guilty?  The minders of course, the dark forces Woodrow Wilson referred to, Quigley, Senator Jenner referred to, even allegedly the Queen, Ephesians 6:12.  This power comes through, for example, the people who were monitoring the 911 terrorists and let them move about unhindered, the ones who accidentally switched off the CCTV on 7/7, the ones who accidentally had an outing of air cover on 911.

Sure, sure – rational explanation for all that. Sure. Always a plausible reason.

The sort of mind, the suits who play this clever game, themselves ultimately incompetent, as former blogger Wolfie said … or at least relying on humans who are, who rely on Man’s natural stupidity, ambition, phoniness, desire for fame and personal glory, these are the ones surrounding and directing the nominal decision makers:


It’s these people whom Behind the Veil speaks of – in this case about those surrounding Natalie Cole and perhaps Whitney Houston and daughter but applicable here as well [my bold typeface again]:

Whatever the problem, it strikes me it is the unseen aspect. The entourage all around. These people shield them, but for whose protection? It might masquerade as the Stars’ interests, but I often think is for the circus that surrounds them. The stars talent makes them a rare cash cow. The donkey that will do all the heavy lifting whilst the hanger on takes their slice.

There was a Perry Mason episode for that too – The Silenced Singer.

In March, 2005, Bush, Fox and Martin, in North America, attended a meeting out of which some accords came, to so alter the face of North America that the functions of society, from defence to welfare, would come under the influence of an advisory body called the NAAC.  Never mind the Constitution.

Bush accepted it as he saw the US directing it and having access, via NAFTA, to other nations’ resources on top of the US’s, so he signed on behalf of the United States, not a binding agreement but agreement with the principles and the new body was named the SPPNA – look them up.  The SPPNA? The CFR, America’s Chatham House, America’s Tavistock.

Look up the antecedents of the CFR, look up Colonel House, Henry Kissinger, Dick Cheney.  Look up Bohemian Grove, the Bilderberg Conference.  Look up their enormous influence, out of all proportion to their non-elected status.  Look up the EU Commission on that score.

These are the very people behind it.  The Christian will ascribe it to the devil, the conservative will ascribe it to the communist, the libertarian will ascribe it to the Statist. The historian will ascribe it to the UN and the Club of Rome. Coleman will ascribe it to C300 and Alex Jones to Bohemian Grove.

Whatever, there is certainly a mind or a group of minds behind it – too many insiders have written on this for it to be just fantasy.  At the time of the founding of the new nation of the United States, the bete noire was the Mason – much literature of the time touches on it.  The formalization of the Illuminati was attempted at that time, before the writer was railroaded.

Why, when the the UN went into Darfur, did the atrocities begin soon after?  Before it had been raping and pillaging, now it was fiendish touches.  Just as with ISIS. Just as in Rwanda after Kissinger’s visit. Just as in Vietnam.  Just as in Abu Ghraib.  Fiendish touches.

And what do we do?  Just accept it, shut it out, become inured to violence. Where are the crowds of people in the street pressurizing Cameron to stop immigration right now, to just take us from the EU?

The would be crowds are blunted, marginalized. The PCist SJWs and the media manipulated population are Legion, too many of them.  Just as with that young SJW, they turn a deaf ear to what they should be directing their energies to opposing and oppose that which they’re directed to.

Far too many people sucked in and fighting the wrong targets, fighting us, their fellow men and women, utterly convinced that this feminism and PCism is important for humanity, when the most inhuman things are being done in its name.  That young SJW again:

After a while it becomes second nature; you just sort of convince yourself that you’re on the right side and see your opponent as a stereotype out of reflex. That can happen here too, but SJW’s actively encourage it. You become utterly convinced that you’re part of an elite, enlightened group fighting an aging generation of uneducated racists and sexists.

Watch the Legion go to work on The Slog.

It’s also not unlike Sarah Connor in Terminator II, trapped behind the wire fence, unable to save those children on the climbing frames and swings, shaking the wire fence as the conflagration begins – that’s us, the readers and bloggers who see it happening but just cannot get the message across.

And slowly, the insanity consumes all, reorders the very fundamentals in our minds as to what is acceptable and what is not.

Further reading, should one wish [via Rossa]