‘Tranny’ bullshit refuted

I have often considered the fact that we hold the right of ‘freedom of speech’ to be the greatest gift won by the civilised nations on this planet. It is one of the first things to disappear when a dictator, or an overbearing regime, whether of left- or right-wing persuasion, takes control of a nation. They do not like the truth being broadcast, and so they attempt to muzzle those who wish to speak out. As with governments so with individuals, university students, and anyone with a particular axe to grind: theirs is the belief/ the truth, and they do not wish it challenged.

Take the ultra-fashionable idea of ‘transgender identity’ and all the associated bullshit which accompanies this twisted ideal. According to the ‘Trans’ lobby, along with, of course, the militant LGBT squads which loudly preach the latest gospel, no-one is allowed to even query the idea that a man, or a woman, can exchange their gender and have everyone accept this as ‘natural’. Now, if anyone wishes to be fooled, and accepts this ‘blarney’ as reality, good luck to them; but what I dislike is the vicious campaign style adopted by the Zealots who believe in the ‘trans’ ideals. They bully, they troll those who wish or attempt to speak out in opposition to their strange and twisted beliefs and ideals; and allow no-one an opportunity to argue against their dictats.

One of the people who, over the years, has constantly riled me with his vocal and literary pursuit of gay or homosexual rights is Peter Tatchell. I am not against homosexual activity, although I regard the proponents of such activity as weird. My attitude is that of Charles Darwin; whose opinions stated that the only sexual activity worth encouragement was that of heterosexuality. Homosexuality, from a Darwinian standpoint, is clearly a disorder. Homosexual acts cannot produce offspring – so gay men and women effectively remove themselves from the gene pool by remaining homosexual. If that is what they wish to do, fair enough; their bodies, and their gene-pools, are their own business. Tatchell’s standpoint was to encourage others to fight, or demonstrate for their ‘rights’; it is my belief that they enjoy exactly the same rights as anyone else on this planet, and deserve no more and no less than any other member of species ‘Homo-sapiens’.

But suddenly, I have developed a great admiration for the ‘rights campaigner extraordinaire’. Seems as though Mr. Tatchell has been through some sort of conversion process, and has attacked both the ‘Tranny lobby’, as well as coming down, if that is the appropriate term, firmly on the side of the ‘gay cake refuseniks’, Ashers of Belfast. Discussing the stalled Appeal against the conviction of two honest Christians who oppose an ideology which is against their deeply held religious beliefs, he stunned many by supporting the bakers in their fight against their conviction.

Tatchell stated “If the Ashers verdict stands, it would mean a gay baker could be made to make cakes saying ‘I’m against gay marriage’,” said Tatchell. “A Muslim printer would have to publish the cartoons of Muhammad or a Jewish printer publish books of a Holocaust denier. So, much as I disagree with Ashers’ right to be homophobic, and I have spoken out against their anti-gay discrimination, they shouldn’t be forced to aid a political message they don’t agree with. I think it’s important to err on the side of freedom of expression and religion.
“It is difficult for me to take this decision, especially given the incredible levels of homophobia in sections of the Northern Irish community.”

The emails from the officer of the National Union of Students were unequivocal. Fran Cowling, the union’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) representative, said that she would not share a stage with a man whom she regarded as having been racist and “transphobic”.

 

10 comments for “‘Tranny’ bullshit refuted

  1. February 16, 2016 at 3:35 pm

    Good man. I just can’t keep down the nausea long enough to post on this topic. Glad someone else has.

  2. Lord T
    February 16, 2016 at 4:06 pm

    They eat their own. How many original feminists are being bashed by the latest batch for not being feminist enough. The inevitable result of encouraging this radicalism.

    ROFL

    • February 21, 2016 at 6:15 am

      *munches popcorn*

  3. john in cheshire
    February 16, 2016 at 4:16 pm

    On top of everything you have rightly said, Mike, this squall in the collectivist hive is a demonstration of the arrogance of youth and lack of respect for their elders. In some respects we post war baby boomers are to blame because of how we rejected everything and everyone who was older than us. Some of this is belated chickens coming home to roost.

  4. Errol
    February 16, 2016 at 5:11 pm

    Mr Tatchell is very confused. I appreciate his acknowledge of the individual’s rights being paramount, but the gay lobby demanded special treatment and wanted to hurt people, forcing them to agree with it.

    Were a Jew to got o a Muslim printers and demand that anti Mohammed publications be made, that Muslim would win his case because, thanks to campaigners such as mr Tatchell, he ‘has a right to’. Same as if a gay couple decide not to make anti anti gay wedding cake, ‘their rights’ will take precedence.

    To the Left it is not about eqaulity, freedom or genuine liberty. Their ‘progressive’ vibrant’ society is dictatorial oppression unless – and only unless – you agree with them. Mr Tatchell is simply getting what we’ve had rammed down our throats the last decade.

  5. Hereward Unbowed.
    February 16, 2016 at 5:58 pm

    When you’ve builded your new Utopia on Satan’s dung pile, with plans laid in Sodom and Gomorrah, with the bricks and mortar of moral relativism.

    The casuistry of equivocation becomes the debate.

    It will be cleansed, through the eternal fire of damnation brought about by the other evil and great crutch the left allied itself with and out of the east – the cult of death. An alien creed of hate encouraged and festered by the left, in order to bring about the downfall of 2000 years of the western tradition.

    Tatchell, if nothing else is, for all his sins an intelligent man, I deem that at long last – perhaps he can now perceive the direction of travel…………………

    Albeit a LONG MARCHER on the long twisted road he set out on, he has somehow arrived at truth and its revelation but is unable to proclaim his Damascene conversion.

    The Gay cake thing, was a confection indeed, an IRA-boyos-Provos inspired anti Prody wheeze – using ECHR to pound what is, a British bakery – Tatchell, now, knows full well what that was all about – too.

  6. Bunny
    February 16, 2016 at 9:51 pm

    Someone I met used relativism to explain to me how the youth of today had it worse than my parents generation, somehow I think being surrounded by a Japanese division in the Arakan is a worse experience than the X-Box generation have been subjected to. Which boils down to the arguments proposed by Tatchell and his ilk in the past have been rubbish and the chickens are happily roosting.

  7. meltemian
    February 17, 2016 at 12:36 pm

    Yes, Peter Tatchell is a bit of a pain in the ‘proverbial’ but he does have his moments.
    I seem to remember him once trying to put a citizen’s arrest on Mugabe!

    • February 21, 2016 at 6:15 am

      SNORK!

  8. mikebravo
    February 17, 2016 at 12:42 pm

    Peter Tatchell. Hoist by his own petard is the perfect analogy for this case. He has spent years forcing his version of “rights” down other peoples throats. Now he is victim of his own style of bullying.

    His Damascene conversion is too late. It is always the way that the intellectuals are the first to be picked off when their revolution comes to pass.

    Schadenfreude indeed.

Comments are closed.