Let’s go back some way
The Lord Ashcroft Brexit statistics on the back of the envelope were interesting, as has been the whole Labour social engineering 1997-2010, with prior collusion from Major and subsequent collusion from Cameron and Osborne.
Then comes the Bill Whittle vid about the purpose of establishing “minorities first” as the guiding social policy principle at governmental level, for once that is established, you can import any malleable or destructive minority or label one within the community, put its supposed needs above the majority and there goes the democratic principle – majority no longer rules.
This principle is, of course, in the EU model. There is then the inuring to do – to get people so used to anti-democratic principles, to officers with weapons in the streets [cf. Bobby principle], federalist politburos [unelected] and so on.
And a rump of new citizens arises in the form of Millennials/Gen X whose school literature tells enormous porkies by omission and directly – we saw the exam preparation notes the other day which called the second amendment something which only applied to people in militias. Authorized of course.
Then the Common Purpose NLP and other groupthink, the Internet of all Things, the way the internet generations of today can just invent something, construct an edifice around it and people of a certain mindset simply embrace it as a reality.
Here is Google redefining Fascist for its upfront dictionary:
In the absence of any counter-definition, how many are going to accept this as accurate? Just as the official Brexit poll card came with the Remain propaganda.
It’s the numbers
Always it comes back to numbers.
Days were that government statistics from the census people were the be all and end all. Now, stats are creative, created to support a view. Cameron himself said the govt was not neutral on Brexit. Startling admission but for once honest.
It’s not recent of course. Trace the Club of Rome’s establishment of what the EU would become and it goes back to the 50s. A similar thing happened in Australia, with the Labor movement, under Evatt [UN Sec-Gen] permeating through every fissure – children brought up on Tawney, Shaw, Marx in what was called Social Studies, Bob Hawke and so on.
The tribal Labor vote was estimated around 40% and so, to gain power in Canberra, the Liberals [Tories] and Country Party had to combine – they’ve always had to have a coalition.
Over here, I’ve seen various estimates put the Labour core around the same 35-40%, the Tory core once 30% until UKIP split it. Add in migration and the postal vote scam and that might nudge Labour up just short of the 50%.
Every election, on every issue, all the time, in perpetuity. In line with the globalists in the UN and EU.
All of this you knew of course but sometimes I like to put it down in black and white, step back and look at it.
The ideas themselves are perverse and deviant
Bill Whittle said he didn’t care about what transgenders imagined themselves to be or what gays did behind closed doors.
Trouble is, they don’t do that, do they? They have to take it to us, people who want no part of it. The trans bathrooms thing was a stroke of evil genius. And that stupid kid interviewed – offered a special bathroom for himself, which would have cost every college payer money, he didn’t want that, did he? He wanted to be in the girls toilets.
One person’s wants trumping the society’s, no matter how weird and sick the ideas. Govt says Minority, therefore that trumps majority.
And the ideas are sick. I define sick as that which causes the body politic itself to deteriorate and disintegrate, e.g. in sanctified marriage. And in medicine, that catalyst is a cancer cell or a virus. The principle is well established, even down to how malignantly it grips the host nation.
There always was an unhealthy interest by kids in sex and violence so nothing new there, except for one thing – this is not something accessible with difficulty, from your Dad’s wardrobe once they go out for the day, this is a steady conduit, a stream, neverending, accompanied by learned “studies” showing none of this can have any negative long term effect. How do they know?
And the fear of being seen as unreasonable, of being a wowser, of being a religious bigot, a Mary Whitehouse. The basic libertarian/centre-right person recoils in horror at being seen as less than even-handed and tolerant.
In other words, even our own friends and like-thinkers are tainted to a greater or lesser extent. I myself am tainted – recoiling in horror at the notion of a theocracy, with its fire and brimstone. Faced with a choice of living with a pack of miserable sinners or with pristine saints, I’m not too sure I could take life with the saints – for a start, I’d not measure up.
It’s that principle which has gone now and the Brave New World kiddies – are they going to be more like Swallows and Amazons kids or like something from William S Burroughs?
And after they’ve grown up, which would you feel safer in the clutches of? It’s their stormtrooper operating manner – witness the Trump protest which opened this post – which is the main worry, the utter lack of respect in those calling for respect, the utter lack of love in those calling for love, the utter lack of tolerance in those calling for tolerance, people screaming about the 1% oppressing them and then being funded by that 1% – that is the worry.
The reality and honesty gap.
And we knuckle-dragging, homophobic, racist, sexist, disablist, religious fascists – have a look at our protest rallies where we jump on cars, dress in clown suits, smash shop windows and loot – gosh, we really are fascists. Look at this very blog post – a diatribe of hatred, yes, couched in heavily CAPITALIZED EXCLAMATIONS, IN LURID COLOURS?
In how many homes are people with these minds trying to turn their sons into daughters, getting them at 4 years of age to self-identify and book the surgery?
What chance has a society where it becomes a majority of people who’ve taken leave of their senses, who’ve lost the plot? Who throw rocks at you with faces of hatred whilst accusing you of hatred?