Having just spent four hours reading:
To anyone exploring the question of who rules us, I would suggest that this blog is as good a place as any to start – when taken in conjunction with the comments threads on the various linked posts, plus all those links, that is sufficient to initiate further exploration.
I’d start here:
… taking particular note of the links in comments for later reference. From here, I’d click on:
… and before going further, I’d suggest that contained within there and the other posts within that series, written leading up to the 2010 GE over here, is all we really need to know for now in order to answer the question.
What so many of those linked articles [internal and external] lead back to, stretching back to antiquity, is that it is all about:
1. Scam and agreed definitions
2. Who holds the money
3. The legal hold on people [see 1 and 2]
One you could throw in here is John Batman in Australia who famously, if apocryphally [who knows] made a treaty with the natives for trinkets and the like. Similar was done by the British around the world, also the East-India Company rewards investigation if you ask Google the right questions, plus the British in China, Boxer Rebellion etc.
It becomes apparent that the very worst elements in the world reside right here, in particular in London and Scotland, the US being a later invention.
Scam and agreed definitions
Essentially, someone with power was one who realized that that meant:
a. Having the money to pay for armies and weaponry
b. Buying such armies and weaponry
c. Getting to set the definitions and write the history.
Therefore, from that position of strength, the law is asserted and the laws are passed. Everything is a definition decided by someone or group of someones and if they are working to a concerted plan, e.g. the Black Nobility, then they take on the robes of legitimacy and that depends on:
[i] Other people’s willingness to accept a system or oligarchy as legit
[ii] See 1. and a, b, c.
Essentially, powerful people [see the definitions again] move into an area and assert – primacy is a factor here, as is usurping and conquest. Always, however it is done, there is an almighty rush to legitimize in law, in contract which, in the eyes of the power, can never be broken. The devil is in the laws.
Who are these powerful people? See Ephesians 6:12. The nature of the networks varies, we can call them Rothschilds, we can go back and call them Sepharvaim or further back – Khazars. It doesn’t matter what they’re called, they are a perverted set of people who have intergenerationally come down to the present day. Call them the Lost Jews, as against the Saved Jews, call them what you want.
A very sharp division now is between each other exploring these things – I take the Christian view that these perverted, the Mammon worshippers, are only part human through the interbreeding since the year dot [see Nephalim etc.]. Others will say they are just men and women, nothing more, having been involved in or having inherited the most enormous pyramids, cosa nostras or scams in the history of the world – ongoing scams.
I suggest that it is a combination of those two views. Can they be defeated? Not by us – it needs someone on a higher plane. To my mind, the question of New Zealand is answered in among the links, also America, also about the Crown. It’s going to take some reading, there’s no easy summary and that’s the point – no blogpost can give an easy summary, one has to read and read. Anything less is scholastic laziness.
Treaty of Rome
March 25th 2017 is the 60th anniversary of the United Nations Treaty of Rome which Baron Robert Rothschild and Paul Henri Spaak helped to formulate. The United Nations was founded under the direction of Baron Robert Rothschild with Paul Henri Spaak as the 1st President of the United Nations General Assembly. Spaak was also the 1st President of the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe.
Sir Edward Coke:
Really must consider Mullins:
More on the Privy Council:
Remembering that Russell was himself one of the communist lost ones, a personally nasty piece of work in his habits: