Defending ourselves against these people

There are serious issues in this area right now and each person must find his or her solution, plus there MUST be a national discussion on it:




Think we need to open this national debate on concealed carry:

At home is a different matter in the UK – you should have, in every room, something which is NOT a weapon in Plod’s eyes but which you could employ as one very quickly and which would incapacitate, even if just your phone to fling or your Raid flyspray – the issue is not at home, you can defend that fairly easily.

The issue is out of the home. for a start, perhaps young women themselves might be allowed conceal carry but I know the issues arising from that. The big thing for women is to have something which would incapacitate out of arm reach of the assailant because once he’s upon her, it’s usually end game. As for the men, it’s mainly gang assault to worry about.

For all indigenous, one needs to do other things, such as not going to populated areas where there is a chance of certain groups with known violent proclivities being anywhere near – this includes nightclubs and the dregs who hang around them.

In Russia, one learnt to “run along rails”, well worn, lit and frequented routes with many people and to only use those within certain hours. Sad, regrettable but necessary. It’s now become like that in the UK with the authorities’ refusal to deal with the threat.

7 comments for “Defending ourselves against these people

  1. Graham Wood
    May 15, 2017 at 10:17 am

    “There must be a national discussion”. There won’t be as no votes in it for politicians.
    This and your previous post on “two deaths” illustrates yet again that if there is no belief in (the biblical) God then there is no real objective reason for morality.
    As Dostoyevsky simply put it: “all things are permitted”
    Or Bertrand Russell (atheist) “if no God then objective right and wrong cannot exist”
    Far better then, on every level, to accept a Christian world-view?

  2. Hereward Unbowed.
    May 15, 2017 at 12:43 pm

    Incontestibly, there will come a time in the not so distant future, when, the executive and the so called forces of law and order will be begging citizens to arm themselves with gubmint provided small arms, materiel, and serve in militias/home guard.

    We all know who the enemy is, what is to be decided, on whose side is, the executive?

  3. Voice of Reason
    May 15, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    Northern women used to carry a half brick in their purses, which they could swing on the end of the strap to devastating effect.

    • May 15, 2017 at 9:19 pm

      Now they just use Mace.

  4. Errol
    May 16, 2017 at 6:25 am

    No, no and, oh look! No again. Guns are not the solution. They are merely a symptom. The US has a problem with guns because, well, they’re stupid. They venerate a killing device.

    The problem is the people committing these crimes. They’re the ones who need to be ‘resolved’. Thus that means deportation. Career criminals should not go to prison but should be flogged. Why waste money on them when branding and flaying the flesh from their back will have the same effect?

    We must, forcibly if necessary integrate and dissolve Muslim culture. This is Britain. You speak English. You don’t yabber on in foreign. Muslim dress must be revoked. Street signs, shop hoardings, that awful prayer wailing, segregation of men and women – end it. Remind people of where they are and why they came here. If they do not accept these rules, there’s the door.

    • May 17, 2017 at 2:43 am

      Errol for Parliament !

      Except for the USA bit. America does not have a problem with guns. A very tiny number of US cities have a problem with criminals with guns. The rest of the country is as placid as Ashby de la Zouche.

  5. May 17, 2017 at 11:19 am

    Cheers, both.

Comments are closed.