Bit different from ‘To Protect & Serve’?

So this bunch of very senior Common Purpose plods / fuzz / coppers decides that the time is right to tell Home Secretary that they are short of cash, stretched resources meaning beat coppers might be in short supply / cannot cope with riots ‘n that / not enough to protect from Muslim Jihadi terrorists!


Fair enough, but how’s about explaining why this ‘virtue-signalling’ farce; was ever allowed to get out of the effing garage?

But the best bit is following the Twitter feed after one bloke tweeted a sarky remark, and the idiot fuzz said he would be reported for an ‘effing hate crime! The local Sussex mob are lit up with the ‘pride’ crap, but they don’t seem to have improved their pubic relations.

If you click on the pix, you’ll see what I mean. Best addition is the ‘My Little Pony’!


h/t our own Julia.

4 comments for “Bit different from ‘To Protect & Serve’?

  1. Errol
    June 24, 2017 at 2:31 pm

    A massive waste of money. The police are not there to promote a sexual choice, they’re there to protect the public.

    Hate crime? There is no such thing. There are only actions. Their motivation doesn’t matter.

  2. June 24, 2017 at 4:11 pm

    Grotesque in its profligacy, buffonery and up-yours-ery.

  3. MTG
    June 24, 2017 at 6:11 pm

    A citizen must never underestimate the power of police stupidity.

Comments are closed.