Plod today

They choose which crimes they’ll investigate but will move en masse to investigate a “hate crime”.

And then of course, there is this:

And this:

And this:

From an entire squad running away from a few threatening Muslims to this sort of thing above, forgive me if I’m wrong but I’d like to be proud of our Plod, not ashamed.


6 comments for “Plod today

  1. John in cheshire
    October 23, 2017 at 8:17 am

    Who is directing this destruction of the police? Amber Rudd? Cressida Dick? The police and crime commissioners? ACPO? Mrs May?
    Someone is otherwise it wouldn’t be happening; is this part of their Common Purpose training? And if they aren’t, then who and why aren’t those mentioned above stopping it?
    I also think the police are engaged in the problem, reaction, solution game to obtain more powers and more money. They should be called out for what they are doing and a few senior police men and women fired.

    • Sonya Porter
      October 23, 2017 at 9:00 am

      Probably Cressida Dick will be amongst them as she is a graduate of Common Purpose.

      • Mona
        October 23, 2017 at 10:50 am

        Cressida Dick her name is bad enough, she has been psycho bleached like all CP graduates, totally re-programmed years ago, where are we heading? I must read 1984 again, clues there somewhere?

  2. October 23, 2017 at 8:27 am

    The police have ceased to be the solution to crime. They are now part of the problem. They have lost the respect of the people.

  3. Mudplugger
    October 23, 2017 at 8:39 am

    According to a House of Commons briefing paper, in 1961 there was one police officer for every 807 of the population.
    The current figure is one police officer for every 462 of the population. That represents a 75% increase in police officer coverage.

    With 75% more proportionate manpower, added to the wealth of technology now available, crime should be almost non-existent and response levels almost instantaneous.

    It’s clear that they have the resources, what they don’t have is the direction.

  4. October 23, 2017 at 1:39 pm

    Or even misdirection.

Comments are closed.