There are two vital posts in order to fully “get” this Peterson/Newman contretemps:
And one comment at Breitbart:
# It was critical theory vs. critical thinking [Celeste Elizabeth, pictured].
Into this, let’s now throw Yuri Bezmenov’s quote from the 80s:
You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their minds. Even if you expose them to authentic information, if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logical behaviour.
In short, they are neither more nor less than robots, Critical Theory robots. And my earlier response to the Peterson/Newman “debate”:
Most men of that calibre are superior to all women of that type. There is no comparison – she is an idiot, a victimhood, self-entitled, SJW non-comp.
I go on to speak of “proper” women who have not been brainwashed and whom I love and quote.
But it is the “debate” in Amfortas’s comments thread which vigorously underscores Peterson’s and Delingpole’s key points, in which the “New” female starts with:
I tried to find common ground, here. But there isn’t any grace or God’s love here, anymore. I should’ve figured that out …
Always resort to the ad hominem and victimized posturing if you don’t have the arguments. And long ago in the mists of time, here is another typical SJW’s attack on me:
Have you ever considered that you might be the Anti Christ? Mad, full of hate, mysogynistic, just plain weird. Man, you tick all the boxes. You are one insane son of a bitch. Bitter. And left as scrap. All those women that you can’t stand tower over you. [Presumably Harriet Harman, Cressida Dick and Julia Middleton, lovely lasses] You want to know why? Because you are a cretin. You are a mad man, of limited intellect, with an axe to grind. You come over as slightly unhinged. That’s why you don’t get a huge outraged response to the tripe that you put out there. Nobody takes you seriously. Mostly we have a laugh.
That says most of what we need to say about the Cathy Newmans of the world [and about the leftist pussified males], in that case back then, a charming lass named Suzie.
If the online world needs any definitive “debate” which underlines Peterson’s point, this one with Newman will go down in history as it. Archive it and refer back to it whenever you need to make this particular point.
Which particular point? Celeste Elizabeth’s of course [slightly paraphrased]:
What we have here is no more nor less than “Critical Theory versus critical thinking”.
Chanting the mantra versus actually thinking and debating, without any thoughts that your overwhelming emotional attacks are not going to carry the day. After all, if it continues to work, continue to do it, the shadow government will reward you for it.
To that tactic, I blow a giant raspberry in that direction.
Why is any of this important?
Why is a minor contretemps going to define this “debate” from now on? Because the brainwashed who are doing the PTB’s will are highly dangerous people. They vote in tyrants who would take away our freedom of thought, word and action, the bedrock of western civilization as perceived by the common people but not at all by the PTB themselves.
Make absolutely no mistake about this – this is what it is all about – silencing dissent. Readers of this site know it, readers of most sites on this side of politics know it and are dismayed to see what’s going on out there – the bastards above tightening the screws with the full blessing of the pink pussy marchers who have lost the power of reason.
And just as Jordan Peterson was a victim of Newman’s barbs, so are we constantly, every day – men and women who still revere freedom. Every day we have to put up with these offensive clowns like the Newmans and Suzies, the Mandelsons, Blairs and Junckers.
Late note – just saw this:
— Alf Garnett (@MrAlfredGarnett) January 23, 2018
Ah yes, our new intelligentsia.