Who actually is the damned enemy?

And as he thus spake for himself, Festus said with a loud voice, Paul, thou art beside thyself; much learning doth make thee mad.

The thing which limits any exploration is asking the wrong questions, failing to go down some rabbit hole because one does not accept the basic premise in the first place.

But far more disabling, in fact inimical to finding out, is to ask how many have had it right there in front of them and have asked, ‘Where? where?’

Hidden in plain sight.

Perceptions are limited by the filter of what, for some reason, you have previously rejected and why have you?

Cut to OoL and a comment from Germany earlier on the two detained by London police:

I never ever would have dreamed that I would use such a quotation to describe the state in which the western europeen society is today, for I am German and I grow up with Voltaire, Kant and the guilt of my grandfathers.

I know Martin Sellners Vlogs and I don’t see any danger these two young people could cause! They have no armed troups, they can be critisized, they use no violence, they only speak out!

Tell me what is behind all this?

Tell me who threatens the freedom of speech and who threatens the freedom of criticize religion. Who the hell is behind all this?

Greetings from Berlin to all you free people in UK.

Cut to Distant Relative at N.O.:

[Less than 4 mins]:

From the latest q drop. Suggests the current administration does want this seen. Make of that what you will.

Cut to my own response:

Now, just to add – Deep Throat said follow the money. Various ferreters have said – follow the Germanic names, from Warburg onwards.

He mentioned Weinberger C. There it is. He asked to whom were these guys in thrall? To the thirteen of course [or whatever combination which currently runs this thing]. But German/Hapsburg is always in that top echelon.

Plus the Askenazi:

Weinberger’s paternal grandparents had left Judaism because of a dispute at a Bohemian synagogue.

The damned. This is as heavy as it gets. Hampering this is if the investigator has a basically atheistic world view because he will miss the deep wheels within wheels of a few thousand years. This is an ancient war.

If you write up the list of miscreants, stymiers, trouble in the world, the Ashkenazi comes in every time, from Marcuse to Benjamin to Alinsky. Unholy alliance is no fictional plot device.

But if a person is incapable of seeing this ancient war, then the picture is confusing and noses follow tails in trying to explain it.

What we have, ladies and gentlemen, is bits and pieces, snippets, in no order and quite untidily strewn over the net. Comprehensive, all-in-one explanations abound and are not to be trusted because that man [or woman] grabs one truth and runs with it, sometimes two truths but it almost invariably misses the mass of material.

Plus there is always an underlying prejudice and agenda.

Who would include the Book of Revelation in an investigation? Almost no one, yes? Why? Because it does not fit the image of the today’s fearless young investigator. And yet there are snippets in there. It doesn’t matter a damn who wrote it, it matters that it was written at all. It doesn’t matter a damn when it was written – even in the C12th by church fathers or in the C1st – point is that it contains references and one of those is to the tribes which will be saved.

Simple question I bet almost no one has followed up – which tribes were NOT included and which other tribe was inserted? Why?

Cut to Jeckyll Island, 1910 and that meeting about the Fed. Look up Warburg.

The Admiral mentions Weinberger and who gave the order to desist. Look up Weinberger.

What I’m saying is you must have done your homework to have a seat at this discussion table now and you must clear your mind of false perceptions – a near impossible task when you do not acknowledge your own prejudices.

One of those is the word Jew- what it means [I’m not one by the way, of either type]. The net has brought to the fore the notion of the Ashkenazi but this thing is far older than that [see Revelation again].

What I’m saying is that you may wish to shy away from this part of the investigation but you cannot – not if you wish to nail it.

So you must read up your Torah and see where and how the split came with the tribes, how the north accommodated the Assyrians and so on. Then go over to Assyrian and Babylonian history and legend. This takes years of scholarship, so most prefer the precis, then reject the precis when it does not accord with the fashion of the day.

Who is behind it all?  A useful line of investigation is the Bertelsmann foundation [Merkel’s bosses], also Count Lipmann and


Catholics who refuse to see the symbolism in the bricks and mortar churches are missing a whole slice of it.

On the other hand, those who reject every practising Catholic because of the sins of Rome are throwing the baby out with the bathwater – the efficacy of faith is long established but just look at the prejudice against this statement – I see the snorting from here.

What’s a Jew? You can’t answer that with the catch-all because there are at least two strains running through it, plus the split within the Talmudic and Kabbalist. if you reject it all as gobbledegook, then you’re missing the point – no one here is pushing it, they’re investigating it – different other animal.  And it come sinto any discussion of who rules.

Ditto gnositicism, paganism and satanism and if you try to say they are not connected, then you have a barrow to push. Many of your criticisms are valid and must also be thrown on the table for discussion.

Who is the enemy?

The enemy is ancient, this is a very old war and even Julia [Ambush Predator] with her gaming might not see all the references in some of the names. Then again, she might but never speaks of them.

And as he thus spake for himself, Festus said with a loud voice, Paul, thou art beside thyself; much learning doth make thee mad.

Have you considered that it is these bozos themselves who are mad? As Paul discovered more and more, he saw just how off their brains they were. Consider this:

Maurice Strong

In 1992, [he was] chairman of the United Nation’s Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro He was co-chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum, became a member of the World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Commission), found time to serve as president of the World Federation of United Nations Associations, on the executive committee of the Society for International Development, and as an advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Wildlife Fund. Above all, he served on the Commission on Global Governance.

Friends included:

– Vice President Al Gore. (Of course.)

– World Bank President James Wolfensohn, formerly on the Rockefeller Foundation Board and currently on the Population Council Board; he was Al Gore’s favored candidate for the World Bank position.

– James Gustave Speth, head of the Carter Administration’s Council on Environmental Quality, crafter of the doomladen Global 2000 report, member of the Clinton – Gore transition team; he now heads the UN Development Program.

– Shridath Ramphal, formerly Secretary General of the (British) Commonwealth, now Co-Chairman of the Commission on Global Governance.

– Jonathan Lash, President of the World Resources Institute –which works closely with the World Bank, the UN Environment Program, and the UN Development Program — and Co-Chairman of the President’s Council on Sustainable Development.

– Ingvar Carlsson, former Swedish prime minister and Co-Chairman of the Commission on Global Governance.

And of course Kofi Annan.

Strong was also involved with the World Service Initiative and photographed with a World Service Initiative trip to Findhorn, the New Age Vatican.

Here were their principles, as stated by them:

The purpose of the World Service Intergroup is to generate a focused, conscious and deliberate intergroup effort to specifically assist the Externalization of the Hierarchy and the Reappearance of the Christ.

Religious scholars will recognize immediately that talk of “The Christ” or World Teacher has nothing to do with the Christian Messiah but a different chap called Maitreya or Djwahl Kuhl who, in the Christian religion has another name and who the Rolling Stones had sympathy for. Strong was at Findhorn, together with the Lucis Trust and you can do your own research on them.

Gordon Davidson and Corrine McLaughlin, who set up the WSI in Washington, D.C. in 1995 were also instrumental in setting up the Valdez Principles, committing corporate America to the Gorean Eco principles still in vogue today. Here is his mindset:

The Shamballa force is in reality Life itself; and Life is a loving synthesis in action. We also used the Six Laws and Principles of the New Age to lead us towards creating a vision of how these principles might create patterns for the New Civilization humanity will be constructing over the next 2500 years.

It goes on and on and on. These are part of the legion of the enemy, the ones pulling the strings and authors, for example, of our current IPCC climate scam.

Look no further than the UN and Agenda 21 or Codex Alimentarius as a good starter:


You might also like to try:

World leadership and food crisis
Codex Alimentarius
Food and water
The green movement and sustainability

Festus again:

And as he thus spake for himself, Festus said with a loud voice, Paul, thou art beside thyself; much learning doth make thee mad.

Mad eh?  Perhaps – it takes a form of madness to follow all these rabbits down holes but “sane” is ignoring it all and saying, “Nah, it’s just not happening.”

Consider the Milner Round Tables and the Committee of 300.  Bridge too far?

Every one of those has its own bias, it’s own prejudice, its own agenda.  Fine – they still make useful points and the scholar merely notes those and adds them to the list.

Lilo Start asked:

Tell me what is behind all this? Tell me who threatens the freedom of speech and who threatens the freedom of criticize religion. Who the hell is behind all this?

All of the above and more, coordinated by some quite evil muvvers who see themselves as rulers of the universe.

Another useful line is the Council on Foreign Relations and the SPPNA – look up Bush, Martin and Fox and the meeting in March, 2005, look up the NAAC.

In Britain, look up Chatham House, London, or Demos [Geoff Mulgan] or Common Purpose or the World Core Curriculum.

Oh and what sort of name was behind the World Core Curriculum?


Robert Mueller. And what nationality is that name?

Now go to Edward Spalton and Germany. He is a scholar on Germany and related issues:

Finally, is this post hostile to Lilo Start as a German?

Not in the least – he or she is my brother/sister, my fellow traveller, a human, but the post is scathing about the Powers That Be and there is no better place to start attacking them than in Britain. You can start anywhere, even with the Scottish Rite.

In the words of another post, it’s no longer left versus right, it’s truth versus propaganda and we’re all being played.

Distant Relative: “Suggests the current administration does want this seen. Make of that what you will.”

Answer is one which often comes up – hidden in plain sight. Eyes Wide Shut.

3 comments for “Who actually is the damned enemy?

  1. Errol
    March 11, 2018 at 12:56 pm

    It isn’t nearly as complicated as that. It comes down to greed, arrogance and spite. The Left hate. They’ve nothing else. They dress up their attitudes in fancy words but they really just disguise pure, unadulterated venom.

    Thus they say they’re doing ‘good’ yet their approaches never achieve anything, and they know it. It’s about them, not about the group they want to help. They destroy instead of build because it’s an easy excuse to tear down what other people create.

    In the destruction, the coercion, the damage they claw power to themselves and force society to their own ends. They are always wrong, millions always suffer and they are always defeated. Then , some group of stupid idiots tries it all again a generation later saying to themselves ‘this time it will be different’.

    • Ted Treen
      March 12, 2018 at 2:45 pm

      Albert Einstein is widely credited with saying, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.”

  2. March 11, 2018 at 8:06 pm

    That’s also so.

Comments are closed.