Diana – modern day Messalina

The only real interest in this is that she is still, like Grace Kelly, wrongly seen as some sort of virtuous victim, when in fact she was a complete whore. This is just the latest:


# Barry Mannakee
# David Waterhouse
# James Gilbey
# James Hewitt
# Oliver Hoare
# William Carling
# Doctor Hasnar Khan
# Bryan Adams
# Dodi Fayed

Those were the established ones, the following was Morton’s research and Burrell’s claims:

# Terence Stamp
# Married movie star TV and stage, both sides of pond
# Captain of industry
# Jeffrey Archer
# Kevin Costner

Great mother for Wills and Hal. They try to excuse her by saying “troubled woman”. There’s nothing troubled about her, she was a royal slapper, by any criteria.

And of course, what does it say about those men?

16 comments for “Diana – modern day Messalina

  1. James Strong
    March 29, 2018 at 5:40 pm

    Yours is nasty post.
    Gratuitous malice about a matter of no importance.
    Consider getting therapy to help you deal with that type of nastiness in your head.

    • March 29, 2018 at 7:52 pm

      Sorry, no can do – I dislike humbug and she was humbug, plus those supporting her.

      She was a slapper – even Frances Shand Kydd was critical – she called the princess a ‘whore’. Ad hominem is fine for me, my shoulders are broad, but it still doesn’t alter what Diana was.

      • Errol
        March 29, 2018 at 8:01 pm

        No, there’s no evidence these events occurred, only the desperate rantings of an attention seeker and a target that cannot fight back.

        Diana was human. The outpouring and wailing I didn’t understand as those same people bought the papers that bought the photos that were taken by the paps hounding her.

        The people lapping up her publicity killed her. Anything else is heresay. The woman is dead. Let her be.

        • March 29, 2018 at 8:04 pm

          Nope, the evidence is conclusive, beyond any question on the first list – the second is based on research but is not insisted on.

          • Errol
            March 30, 2018 at 11:23 am

            Is it? Could you present it?

            Either way, why the vitriol? She’s dead. 2 boys lost a mother. A man a wife he didn’t like. Parents a daughter.

  2. DaveK
    March 29, 2018 at 9:25 pm


  3. March 29, 2018 at 10:12 pm

    There’s no question she had it away with those men. Choosing one at random:

    Oliver Hoare, a friend of Prince Charles, had an affair with Diana after meeting her at a gym.

    He and his French-born aristocrat wife Diane were also good friends of Camilla Parker Bowles’s sister Annabel and her businessman husband Simon Elliott.

    The affair was first revealed in 1994.

    How many make a slapper – 2? 4? 8? She exceeded all of those.

  4. Pcar
    March 29, 2018 at 10:43 pm

    In general, I beleive accusing/insulting the dead is wrong.

    However, with Diana, her acolytes and MSM won’t stop the “Saint Diana” message. Thus rebuttals are fair.

    Charles was discretely unfaithful with one woman. Diana the Slapper publicly slept around with many men.

    btw She’s a criminal too: If she’d obeyed law and worn seat-belt she would not be dead – clunk, click every trip.

    • Errol
      March 30, 2018 at 11:26 am

      When it was announced Diana had been killed I was playing with lego in my parents house. Since then they’ve moved, Dad’s died, I’ve bought and sold two houses, run two companies, married, had a baby and had two dogs, one the son of the other.

      She’s dead. Hate her if you want but it’s such a monumental waste of your energy. Why continue it? What do you gain from it?

      • March 30, 2018 at 1:28 pm

        I see you misunderstand, invoking the word “hate”, as left-liberals always do for someone who exposes something. I dislike humbug, that’s all. Doesn’t matter who it is, whatever side of the fence it is – if it’s humbug, it gets exposed.

    • Ted Treen
      March 30, 2018 at 2:38 pm

      I’m not certain the “criminal” charge is true: the crash occurred in Paris, and I’m not convinced that at that time, belting up was mandatory there for rear-seat passengers. Anyway, we all know that Les Grenouilles treat all laws with utter contempt if they don’t agree with them – or simply can’t be arsed with complying.

  5. Hereward Unbowed.
    March 31, 2018 at 1:54 am

    I’ll never understand why a fairly simple girl was asked by a dork of a prince for her hand in marriage, the bigger surprise was that she gave the affirmative, after that it was always going to be a disaster made and descent into a personal hell – for her.

    The rest of it, I think she tried to be a good mother, she died sadly, horribly and prematurely, I was quite appalled at the outpouring of faux grief and what she saw in Fayed’s son, only God knows.

    it’s history, let her be, but should the clown prince ascend to the throne (God forbid), that silly cow Camilla can NEVER be allowed to be named as his ‘Queen’.

    May she reign on, long live HRH. Elizabeth II, I say.

    • Vera
      March 31, 2018 at 1:17 pm

      Diana was naïve and she had Prince Charles as her pin-up – pictures on her wall like a silly teenager which is what she was. Prince Charles had been carrying on with Camilla for years but he couldn’t marry her, not that Camilla wanted that, because she had ‘been round the block a few times’, was already married and was not aristocratic enough – those were the rules then. Charles had to have a virtuous aristocratic girl as his wife. Prince Charles was getting on age wise and needed to get married to produce an heir but he was still knocking about with Camilla who didn’t do the decent thing and make herself scarce. Prince Philip got fed up with Charles’ dithering and bullied him into getting married and let’s face it Diana was a beautiful girl, not well educated but charming. Unfortunately Charles thinks it is his right as heir to the throne to have a mistress and he is petty and spiteful and was jealous of the attention Diana got – basically Charles married the wrong girl and then f—– it up massively. The only person Charles loves is himself and he thinks he loves Camilla because she realises she just has to pander to him and all will be well. And I suppose Diana did have many lovers but not until she realised that Charles was not interested in her, his wife, and was going to continue to s— Camilla. Was she supposed to just shut up and live a celibate life?

      • March 31, 2018 at 1:21 pm

        Completely agree on Chas and Camilla but I was referring to Diana only. 🙂

        Do I detect a whiff of “protect Di at all costs”? Now why would that be?

      • Pcar
        April 3, 2018 at 12:09 am


        And I suppose Diana did have many lovers but not until she realised that Charles was not interested in her, his wife, and was going to continue to s— Camilla. Was she supposed to just shut up and live a celibate life?

        “celibate life?” – Yes or No was her choice – however, she should have obeyed protocol (not just Royal) and been equally discrete, not publicly flaunt her infidelity.

        Two or ten+ wrongs do not make a right. She demeaned, embarrassed & damaged herself & her children, the consequences of which are apparent.

        Imagine William/Harry at school: everyday taunts of “who is your mum shagging tonight?”

Comments are closed.