We are fed up [part three]

My intention was to leave this “We are fed up” mini-series at two posts but a comment [now deleted] crossed a line in the sand and it needs to be addressed. Trouble is, other comments addressing it also had to be deleted and the posts closed off.

First, look at the expression “we are fed up”. It presupposes that there was something before which, though not perfect, was workable, livable and now some people are doing some things to very much upset that and frankly, “we” are fed up with those things.

Second, look at who “we” are. “We” suggests a group of people joined together in a common purpose but that is a mischaracterisation of those I now presume to speak for.

“We”, in this case, are a disparate lot of people in various countries, from all walks of life, different cultures and yet similar development, disagreeing on many things, I’ve used the expression before – to get any sort of agreement from us is “like herding cats”.

We are so different to each other’s walks in life, we do disagree on so many other issues yet all these individuals are agreed on certain key issues and this agreement revolves around stopping this cultish behaviour by a group which, for want of a better term, we call leftist or PCist or SJW or snowflake or cultural marxist or one world govt or global elite or a whole lot of other terms.

Much reference is made to insane, loony left and so on.

Now, this comment I’ve just deleted made reference to us being a cult ourselves but how can that be when we’re not even agreed on so many things? 

What is a cult?  It’s a group with a common ideological purpose.  If you consider returning to what we had before as a common purpose, then fine but we are reactive, not proactive and the cult we’re trying to stop is very much proactive.

In fact, there is a quote about it, from 1954, by Senator William Jenner:

Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government – a bureaucratic elite.

We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state … The important point to remember about this group is not its ideology but its organization. It is a dynamic, aggressive, elite corps, forcing its way through every opening, to make a breach for a collectivist one-party state.

It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government without suspecting that change is under way… If I seem to be extremist, the reason is that this revolutionary clique cannot be understood, unless we accept the fact that they are extremist.

It is difficult for people governed by reasonableness and morality to imagine the existence of a movement which ignores reasonableness and boasts of its determination to destroy; which ignores morality, and boasts of its cleverness in outwitting its opponents by abandoning all scruples.

This ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century… This group … is answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.

1954 – think about that – it has never changed, the agenda is the same, just called by different names.  Everything is due to it – gay marriage, transgender, drugs, kids in school being corrupted by the new teachers, bad parenting, atonal music, ugliness in art – all of it comes down to this elite corp and there are copious pages supporting this contention, as Senator Jenner well knew.  So did Louis McFadden, so did Clinton’s victims, e.g. Vince Foster. So did David Kelly over here.

The best “we” can ever get is that on any specific issue, e.g. Kavanaugh, we temporarily fall on one side of the line.

Now I know of some “good” women who actually do have reservations and would like to know more – KellyAnne Conway is one of those – but she also sees the fanatical singlemindedness of the vendetta on the other side [see Jenner again] and so understands she has to oppose that vendetta first, get them to stop that massive pressure and the elite rush to judgment [remember JFK?], then things can be discussed more rationally.

Actually, they never can be, but that’s the ideal.

Who then are this “we”? It’s 63 million Americans, 17.4 million Brits, plus probably a lot more now, it’s the 67% backing Orban, it’s those who put Salvini in, it’s the AfD supporters, it’s the party in Sweden which did so well but did not take the majority.

If all these people are singleminded at this time, it is over certain core issues you’re all well aware of, we’ve posted endlessly about them. Our notion, once it is done, e.g. the Kavanaugh confirmation, is to drop back into normal life until this cult of the left tries its next trick on us.

Hence we are fed up to here with it.  Weary of it.  Hence James Woods’s tweet:

The reason we oppose this cult is “anarchy”, “lawlessness”, the substitution of the rule of the mob for the rule of law, the telling of outrageous lies.  When law enforcement itself is lawless, selective, flippant on important matters, savage on irrelevant matters, then there is big trouble.  We know all this but people need to articulate this in their minds.

That’s what we’re up against.

“They act like savages.”  Yes, just as with their “refugees welcome” that has swept Europe, the US and anywhere else formerly civilised.

Now, there’s a simple litmus test – if you know all this, if you can see it, then you too are fed up.  I don’t know you personally, we don’t have a cult HQ, we don’t have secret handshakes, we meet in the comments threads of blogs and some of us tweet.

We are, simply, disgruntled by this leftist elite cult which controls everything – hospitals, education, the law, entertainment, the media, everything and they also actively try to stop our voices too.

If you can see that, then we are in a very loose alliance of thinking … for now.

If you can’t see this in the least, then YOU, yourself, are the problem, or part of it. You are the one spreading cult propaganda, thinking you’re spreading sweetness and light.

You are the brainwashed, you have been conned, this elite is NOT spreading sweetness and light at all. “Equality and diversity”is the euphemism used to ram through anti-human legislation which criminalises us for opposing it.

And it is spreading through the community like a virus, like cancer, so often passed on by the young, the weak, the politically mindless and inexperienced – perfect example is Ocasio-Cortez, Penny Red over here, Hollywood celebs, Jim Carrey, Bruce Springsteen, spreading such anti-human policies that anyone forty years ago in this society would have been appalled.

And even these “carriers of the disease” are themselves so hardwired that they cannot see their cognitive non-sequiturs.  Your sister, your daughter, your brother, your son – they’ve all succumbed to the brainwashing by this insidious system.

Therefore, because no one anymore is loosely bound by their root faith as they used to be, even if only paying lip service to its precepts, there is a huge vacuum and into this vacuum comes this sickness Senator Jenner indicated.

Yuri Bezmenov said similar:

“You cannot get rid of them, they are contaminated, they are programmed to react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern.  You cannot change their mind, if you are to expose them to authentic information …”

And as various pundits have noted in the past few days – the VERY things they accuse you of is what they, themselves, are heavily involved in. THEY are the cult, therefore they call you a cult.  They are the misandrists, therefore they call you a misogynist.

Deep inside them, as with Darth Vader, there is still a certain goodness, although in Vader’s case it was hatred of the worlds which drove him. These people hate only those who try to pull them up, who try to stop them, for reasons clearly set out in black and white.

They react with fury, they try to “deplatform” you, they send in their Antifa to disrupt, they try to create “sanctuary cities” free from sound ideas, they try to create “safe spaces” on campus where they can put their hands over their ears and make noises, “Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah,” as a child does to shut out reality.

They try to come back at you as if YOU have some sort of problem. 

Yes, we do – with them. We ourselves get along fine.

They will not listen nor learn about anything, no matter how many thousand posts the blogs have posted, many of them in fine detail, with many readers contributing.

They interpret these truths as ravings of “a cult”, it’s the only way to handle the cognitive dissonance of their own view being so diametrically opposed to ours, so set upon by all of us, all over the world.

We can’t be right, they say, they are the do-gooders, spreading peace love and destruction they say to themselves.

NO! Wrong!

In fact they are spreading evil, they are spreading destructive, well worked out scams coming out of the UN, out of the elite thinktanks, e.g. the CFR, e.g. Chatham House, e.g. the Bruderheist in Germany, formerly out of the Frankfurt School, out of Venice. 

These people think their left-liberalism is the face of kindness. I say it is the face of evil. 

Look at that Dutch “refugees welcome” woman who just committed suicide because she finally saw it, saw what she had aided and abetted through her voting and marching and many millions are poised to do the same in these midterms.

Rotherham 1400 girls raped underage. Not one word, not one, from these dogooders.  It would cause too much cognitive dissonance.

They are in the wrong on this, which is why our anger is spreading across Europe and America, this pushback, this reaction.

And will this lady who called us a cult learn anything?

Will she hell. 

Let’s go back to Senator Jenner one last time:

If I seem to be extremist, the reason is that this revolutionary clique cannot be understood, unless we accept the fact that they are extremist.

We are reactive. We are reactionary. Our actions come after their attempts to change society, not before. We accepted vaguely how it was before, obviously with issues here and there. Now these people are wrecking this.

There is NO communication with these people, none. They must simply be stymied in their actions.

13 comments for “We are fed up [part three]

  1. Pcar
    September 20, 2018 at 10:27 pm


    Re: https://4liberty.org.uk/2018/09/20/todays-rape-quiz/

    “Comments are closed.”

    Very poor show. Why this adoption of CiF’s policy?

    To answer title: a MONA/PONA

    On your argument, I tend towards James Strong’s view.

    As on today’s news: Westminster terrorist murderer was a RoP convert.

    When assessing risk, skin colour is a good start as is clothing, demeanour, speech, attitude and accent. However, it is only a start not proof. Wise to be wary, but not shoot on sight.

  2. September 21, 2018 at 6:10 am

    Nope, not poor show at all, it’s rare enough and was necessary, as I had RL issues and could not attend comments, had the potential to blow out. I never take decisions lightly. Plus there was a separate attack going on, the risk was high. Readers don’t see all that goes on.

  3. September 21, 2018 at 12:38 pm

    If you start to read up on the “Common Purpose” organisation in the UK, then you start to understand how so many branches of Government can all be hamstrung by diversity and equality and perform so pathetically. They always say they are neutral, but follow the Progressive (Marxist) groupthink.

    More interested in diversity that doing the job properly, blinded by a blinkered adherence to box ticking and appearances than performance.

    When an organisation actively targets leaders in Local and National government, Emergency Services, the Military, Business and Charities and trains them on secretive “leadership development” programmes with a slogan of “Leading Beyond Authority”, you start to see something sinister.

    Unaccountable but funded largely by the tax payer. Despite having influence across huge numbers of powerful people, they are silent and uninvestigated. Initially innocuous, pathologically progressive, promoting diversity and equality in preference to proper leadership and actually doing the job you’re paid to do.

    They launched in the USA back in 2009 to spread the progressive agenda across the pond.

    Worth a Google if you’ve never heard of them.

  4. Bill
    October 2, 2018 at 8:30 am

    That picture contains some useful things, other than the ginger chap stood upright and his mate sat on the ground, easy to see as it is a large image and blows up well with image viewing software.

    First off matey under the lamp post appears to have been holding a walkie talkie in his right hand which may have been photoshopped out.

    Next up matey with his back to camera appears with the badly wounded chap sitting on the ground in this image. Sitting chap with a faked head injury, standing chap just a tad cold and embarassed.


    The chap kneeling on the left of the ‘already wounded victim’ wearing the quilted jacket with a ‘velvet’ collar looks very similar to the chap who shot the black fella. The one nearest ‘the body’.


    Assuming of course that the appalling quality pair of images aren’t photoshops. Given the fact the in hi viz walking mid screen pays no attention at all to his wounded comrade collapsing into the gutter, photoshopping is highly likely.

    The little chap at the back all in black with a camera round his neck and a reporters pad in hand is presumably the one who took the pictures from the reverse angle, where we see Ginger sitting down and he looks for all the world like George Llewellyn John, Stephen Lennons cameraman and boyfriend of his sound man/interviewer Caoalan Robertson as evidenced by this picture on Twitter. In which those that doubt can clearly see that Tommy Robinson is a “stage name”. Makes one wonder about the other faces/names in that picture.


    His crew of George & Caolan are silent on the current Tommy in court drama and that Ezra character, who sacked the three amigos Stephen, George and Caolan, is the only ‘figure’ tweeting about it.

  5. Bill
    October 3, 2018 at 11:42 am

    Thank you for the video links.

    Here’s a few more anomalous images.

    First spot the man in the white shirt ‘on the phone’ in this one with his back to camera. On a video on youtube he can be seen running up the cobbles ‘attack scene’ without his jacket on.


    And yet here is with his jacket on in an earlier ‘take’ once again, on the phone.


    Here is an immediate aftermath of the car crash showing massive damage to the front 2.5 tonne car and no damage to the stone pillar it is supposed to have hit.


    And here is a later shot with a sheet of plywood hiding the lack of damage.


    There is a youtube video of a man carrying the plywood well worth a look its also in one of Richard D Halls videos.

    Finally here is a seemingly distraught police officer being led away from the scene right by the ambulance. The chap in the blue shirt is putting his jacket on.


    Here is another take where they have ‘swapped sides’ and are walking by the hedge and the man in the blue shirt has no jacket on doesn’t even have it in hand.


    • Pcar
      October 4, 2018 at 12:06 am

      I hate to say this, but given Blair it is plausible. The Westminster Bridge attack was faked by state and some may have been sacrificed by state. The heli video of cops etc doing nothing swayed me.

  6. Bill
    October 4, 2018 at 10:03 am

    This picture was one of two which made me say out loud “Hang on a minute, how?”.


    Had that car had that amount of damage caused by hitting that signpost then the post would be bent, damaged, out of line none of which is evident in that and all the other pictures of the signpost.

    The other was of what we were told was the body of a man lying on an incline with his head down the incline having had his head almost sliced off without a single trickle of blood running away from the body.

    The ramifications of this inside a mind that up until these pictures were seen believed everything was as the state and media said it was I cannot put into words.

    I would hope no genuine emergency service personnel took part in the Westminster events themselves. We have been trained to see hi-viz over black and over green as genuine people doing genuine things it is too hard to discern they are not what they appear to be until enough attention is paid to their actions which betray them. The loading of the ambulance images certainly suggest everyone there was an actor

    What of the Member of Parliament and the Prince?
    The former having a military background, we are told, must have known he was taking part in a show what this reveals about Parliament and its 650 commons members is almost beyond comprehension, save to say it and they do not do anything we are told they do.

    There are at least two commons chambers in existence. One in the Parliament building and one in an anonymous looking building in a media complex used for a tv series. It is a carbon copy of the former.
    Neither is affected by daylight so filming can go on day and night in both.

    Then there is the involvement of the son of a Monarch. What was he aware of?
    And again what does this reveal about the entirety of the monarchy on this island?

    This brings me back to Stephen Lennons character Tommy Robinson (in reality no different to Keith Lemons character Avid Merrion). He and his crew took part in the framing of the narrative within the press compound presumably on the day of the show or equally possible filmed prior.
    He and Caolan said they were ‘in London filming’ and heard about the attack so headed on over to shoot a piece to camera.
    Once on the scene they were allowed into the press compound and shot their piece. Ergo they are as far as the state is concerned bona fide card carrying registered journalists.
    Would the state security services allow a genuine opposer of state policy the tools to spout their oppostion?

    It is the age old ‘control the opposition by being the opposition’ ploy. It rarely fails, if indeed it has at all, as far as I can tell.
    Tommy the character (Tommy the name for British soldiers in the First World War…no conincidental use of name) is seen as a warrior for truth stood alone against the hordes of the left’s anonymous social justice warriors.
    A hero who doesn’t exist.
    Were he using his own name Stephen Lennon, ‘the hero of the right’ wouldn’t need the state propaganda machine called ‘the free press and the alternative media’ to promote the character and we would hear very little if anything about him in ‘the press’.

Comments are closed.