What’s in a milkshake?

So what’s new?


Constant daily assault on Trump, a new barrage every day with ‘may’ and ‘could’ and a liberal dose of ‘should’ – yet the names Clinton, Waters, Pelosi, Obama, Rice, Comey, are never investigated or just maybe they are now and this is the last hurrah of the swamp and its media lackeys – look at the source.

Yet reading the Wail article, it seems all cut and dried and DJT IS guilty of hundreds of crimes. But because he is Prez, they can say what they like in speculative mode.

The other one getting constant daily faeces flung at him is Tommy Robinson. He’s really got inside their heads, has he not? You can always tell them – they call him SYL instead of TR and you just know what’s coming after that. Over there, they start with this Drumpf nonsense. To be fair, I usually start on Obama and husband as Soetoro.


Of course it’s not OK:

Sometimes I think that the British Establishment won’t rest until Tommy Robinson ends up murdered. If this were to happen, it would kill a number of birds with one stone.

First, it would rid the liberal elite of one of its most determined and outspoken critics — especially on the very awkward topics of Islam and rape gangs.

Secondly, it would almost inevitably result in rioting, which the government would secretly welcome as an excuse to flex its authoritarian muscles.

Delingpole is no EDL marcher, yet he saw and I saw and you saw because we posted on it here, TR and Carroll assaulted before the police’s eyes and they did nothing, zero, zilch. They did not uphold the law.

Then they arrested TR for disturbing the peace.

A commenter wrote, on the Trump biz above that no one accepts it, even those against him who are still basically decent people, simply because all trust is gone that anything coming out of those sources is tosh.

It is truly irrelevant if you like or don’t, I’m still waiting for those with this ‘TR is not real’ guff to post any sort of proof apart from his name and things he was arrested for – mostly stitched up for, some because he was a naughty lad from Luton.

But the major objection I have is that neither he nor Trump are accorded basic assumption of innocence unless there is some sort of incontrovertible evidence otherwise.  In the case of TR, it is far from sufficient to mention his being convicted – so was Joan of Arc and then she was burnt.

If there were no stitch up, then that court verdict would not have been overturned and the judge rapped on the knuckles.  but it was overturned and he was rapped on the knuckles.

A major factor in all this are agents provocateurs – openly, like Antifa and HatenotHope, but also secretly, like that Soubry man with the communication device.

People, it’s mushroom time.

10 comments for “What’s in a milkshake?

  1. john in cheshire
    May 7, 2019 at 8:59 am

    And what if the next time a scrawny muslim gets near to Tommy Robinson, it’s not a milkshake he throws. muslims have a love of acid and other disfiguring liquids; one of these muslims tried to throw boiling sugar water over Tommy Robinson when the state imprisoned him in a muslim infested prison.

    I’ve made a small contribution towards the cost of extra security for him because it’s obvious the state are not going to do their job and keep him, a candidate in the upcoming EU elections, safe while he is campaigning.

  2. Bill
    May 7, 2019 at 9:35 am

    I like him.

  3. May 7, 2019 at 9:37 am

    Thanks, both.

  4. FrankH
    May 7, 2019 at 9:45 am

    If a man decides that he wants to be a woman, it’s a “hate crime” to refer to him, sorry, of course I mean her, as a man. Why is the same standard not applied when a man wants to be called by a different name? Why is it not a hate crime to call Tommy Robinson by his old name?

    • May 12, 2019 at 6:57 am

      If it wasn’t for double standards, the progressives wouldn’t have any…

  5. Itellyounothing
    May 7, 2019 at 10:55 am

    TR makes the government look like Nazis without even trying…….

  6. May 7, 2019 at 12:02 pm
  7. Voice of Reason
    May 7, 2019 at 4:12 pm

    The GOP spent over $100 million investigating both Bill and Hillary Clinton, and managed to get a minor perjury charge over consensual sex acts between two adults. There were something like 7 investigations on Benghazi alone.

    Are the GOP that ineffective?

  8. May 7, 2019 at 4:47 pm


  9. Pcar
    May 8, 2019 at 12:36 am


    Did you mean Loretta Lynch?

    TR Exposes MSM “race hate” fake news attempt

    Excellent, well done TR

Comments are closed.