Who is William Webster?

Polly does not often gloat but here she has just cause:

Matt Gaetz asked why the Dems are pursuing this impeachment farce which Tom Fitton calls as it is – a coup attempt.

I’m surprised more people have not tumbled to it. Yes, many remembered Clinton’s comment that if they did not rid themselves of Trump, they’d all swing and that’s very much their first concern, the wrongdoers, but there is also something else which would be exposed – the flank of the faceless deep state itself before it’s ready … and that would never do.

This is why they’re so vehemently pushing this before Christmas. Or to ask it a different way – why before Christmas?

Answer – because there’s a timetable, innit, an international timetable, also shown in Bruce Charlton’s and DR’s point about why these meathead women are being pushed so hard for leadership roles.

I must, at this point, refer you again to Svali in the year 2000 who mooted this in a Toronto Centrex interview, it was part of the cult propaganda that the new leaders would be announced in 2020 in the midst of world crisis and people would be asked to pledge loyalty. That is supposedly the endgame.

Hence the emergence, quite openly, in every western nation, of out-and-out communism in these last couple of years. The big C is just one of any number of buzzwords for the same takeover, or as Common Purpose puts it: Leading Beyond Authority.

They’ve dropped it from the tagline now – always clandestine, always funded beyond. Are we still going to be three wise monkeys swimming in a river in Egypt about all this?

But as someone pointed out on Twitter – what happens if they do rid themselves of Trump tonight, US time?  [They have done so at 02:17 UK time, I haven’t looked, as I’m writing this.]

They then go after Pence. Who becomes President if something happens to Pence? Look it up.

And that’s why this is rightly, not in a jargonistic way, being called a coup.

And this is happening right now in “real time”. All right, let’s switch to the UK and dire Brexit warnings. Skip past the Taylor Swift part and focus on the Soros and BoE part:

Assuming you have actually watched both videos, not just skipped over them, then that article with Soros’s warning – what date was it? Monday, June 20th, 2016. And what happened on Thursday, June 23rd in the UK?

All right, in general, what have we here? Idle bombastic threat, or a good reading of the markets, or is it that he and whomever he’s an untouchable front for, are seeking a pretext to crash the pound?

Why would they? Because the pretty game on the continent will be up. Can anyone crash a national currency? Soros did, and back in 1857, Peabody did.

Who was Peabody?


Precursor of JPM of course. Are you starting to catch the drift? Now, look at this coincidence:

George Peabody set up shop in the aftermath of the 1837 panic.


Then along came the next crash, in 1857 and:

Corsair, the Life of J.P. Morgan, tells us that the Panic of 1857 was caused by the collapse of the grain market and by the sudden collapse of Ohio Life and Trust, for a loss of five million dollars.

20 year plan.  What replaces currency? SDRs. Issued by whom?

Have you noticed how pundits and various readers are always telling us “never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence”?

I suggest that much indeed can be attributed to malice, using incompetence as its front. Please see again Dr. Bruce Charlton in this comment, referring to Ms Wrong-Daily and Rayner:

Ah RL-B – the Nebby Nursing Officer: perfect representative of what Leftist policies actually do, always – increase the bureaucracy of surveillance and control, and put female middle managers like her ‘in charge’ (as being obedient rule-followers who are constitutionally unable to lead; hence perfect ‘fronts’ for the shadowy real leaders in the shadows).

On the other hand, all decent people hate the charmless incompetent overpromoted middle-manager types (Merkel, May, Sturgeon etc – plus most major British institutions).

Or surveillance cameras failing on 7/7 or the failure to scramble and intercept on 911 and so it goes on. This is what Svali actually said in that 2000 interview:

I was told that by the year 2020, the New Order would be openly revealed, BUT that may have been cult propaganda.

An economic collapse that will devastate the economy of the US and Europe, much like the great depression.

One reason that our economy continues limping along is the artificial support that the Federal Reserve had given it, manipulating interest rates, etc. But one day, this won’t work (or this leverage will be withdrawn on purpose) and the next great depression will hit.

The government will call in its bonds and loans, and credit card debts will be called in. There will be massive bankruptcies nationwide. Europe will stabilize first and then Germany, France and England will have the strongest economies, and will institute, through the UN, an international currency. Japan will also pull out, although their economy will be weakened.

Peacekeeping forces will be sent out by the UN and local bases to prevent riots. The leaders will reveal themselves, and people will be asked to make a pledge of loyalty during a time of chaos and financial devastation.

20 years.

In that Bruce Charlton comment, he goes on to look at BoJo himself. He mentions his source in another comment. Think on’t, ladies and gentlemen.

Tinfoil hat, us?

Maybe, maybe not. But I do think we’re asking the wrong question – it is not whether there is malevolence by a nasty cabal – there is – but whether such a cabal could have any traction, such that they can infiltrate and fill positions in order to collapse a system?

That’s the real question – are they just full of their own power beyond their capabilities or are they actually capable of doing this, despite their own incompetence?

UPDATE at 03:12, UK time:

Yep, the DemRats have done it.

8 comments for “Who is William Webster?

  1. December 19, 2019 at 7:37 am

    Just a few notes:

    1. Dan Bongino: Incredible how stupid so many liberals are. Twitter is blowing up with dopey liberals worried that Mike Pence is taking over now that the police-state Democrats impeached President Trump.

    2. Joel Comm: The levels of stupidity are truly reaching biblical levels.

    There are two other things – firstly, the DemRats can withhold the articles so the trial cannot go ahead but against that, the Senate can acquit anyway, plus it needs two-thirds, not 50% + one.

    If readers have not done so, I suggest they look through the two Polly vids – I know people skip over these things in their haste all the time – because, together with the farce last night, it points more to deep state machinations than little else can.

    Just as with BoJo’s GE and intentions towards Brexit, I’ve now said my piece on the theatrical event last night.

    Rossa’s mother has sent this:

    [Trump] has NOT been impeached, it was only an inquiry, not an investigation, despite what the dems say or think.

    Likely he’s going to the SC this morning for an indication that what they have done is completely illegal.

    There are thousands of sealed indictments and if the big one is opening soon, it will blow the whole thing out of the water!!


  2. Valentine Gray
    December 19, 2019 at 4:36 pm

    There is panic stations at the Dems HQ, Trump cannot be impeached, (sounds like loosing your virginity) or removed from office , just waiting for the Barr-Dunham investigations to finish America will be sick and ashamed.

    • James Strong
      December 19, 2019 at 6:56 pm

      Trump certainly can be impeached. 2 Articles of Impeachment have been passed.

      So,does that mean he stands impeached now,or will he be impeached when those Articles are sent to the Senate?

      Perhaps ‘m’learned friends’ can clarify.

      • December 19, 2019 at 7:58 pm

        It’s a question everyone’s grappling with.

      • Mudplugger
        December 19, 2019 at 8:36 pm

        As I understand it, he is ‘Impeached’ when the House of Representatives approves the article(s) – but in this context impeachment merely means that the House has committed him for trial and, in this case, the ‘court’ responsible for conducting that trial is the Senate. If the Senate acquits him (which it will), he still remains ‘impeached’ and can wear that label with pride, but also remains in office (like Clinton did).

        • Valentine Gray
          December 20, 2019 at 9:12 am

          Read the latest Gateway Pundit on the legality of the impeachment process by Trumps lawyers and the other legal opinions out there questioning this so called impeachment was in fact an impeachment due to Pelosi’s prevarications???

  3. December 20, 2019 at 10:10 am

    Yes, we can only watch and wait.

  4. December 30, 2019 at 8:21 am

    “Why would they?”

    Because they can. They don’t need a better reason.

Comments are closed.