Think tanks do control governments

You only need do the most cursory reading and it is not even in dispute – pollies are there through patronage and are usually unimaginative people, thus Johnson has his Cummings, the French Revolution had its Voltaire, the SPPNA had it’s CRA.

https://nourishingobscurity.blogspot.com/2009/09/obama-lets-cut-to-chase.html

If Bush, Fox and Mulder had got away with it, the CRA would be openly controlling the US, instead of just covertly controlling successive presidents.

But it’s right through modern history:

This was the SNP’s programme to assign each new child a State Mentor:

Were you aware of it?  Have you forgotten?  They rely on you to forget all their nasty efforts to enslave and it goes right back in history:

May 30, 1919 – Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House; attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes.

House was Wilson’s ‘mentor’,involved in the Great Work of Ages, as was Kissinger and Cheney.

1920-1931 – Louis T. McFadden is Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency. Concerning the Federal Reserve, Congressman McFadden notes: “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.

Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is – the Fed has usurped the Government. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.”

Concerning the Great Depression and the country’s acceptance of FDR’s New Deal, he asserts: “It was no accident. It was a carefully contrived occurrence. The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as the rulers of us all.”

Depression – yeeesss, guess what’s coming, now oil has tanked in the US?

1921 – Col. House reorganizes the American branch of the Institute of International Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). [For the past 60 years, 80% of the top positions in every administration – whether Democrat or Republican – have been occupied by members of this organization.
During that time, only two Presidents have not been directly affiliated with the CFR – John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan. Kennedy was assassinated and an attempt was made on Reagan’s life!]

And so it goes on:

December 15, 1922 – The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine “Foreign Affairs.”

Author Philip Kerr states: “Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as the earth remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states, until some kind of international system is created. The real problem today is that of world government.”

Moving along:

1932 – “Plan for Peace” by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks,” including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics. [The American Birth Control League eventually becomes Planned Parenthood – the nation’s foremost promoter and provider of abortion services. Many today are not aware of the origins of Planned Parenthood.] 

Haven’t even touched on the Dulles Bros yet – this thing has been going on for so long.  Why do you think the League of Nations collapsed, to be replaced by the UN?

The agenda never changes and government does listen. Where did Blair’s ideas come from?  Well one source was the blogger Norman Geras and the Euston Manifesto – remember it?

http://eustonmanifesto.org/2006/10/29/the-progressive-case-for-public-service-reform/

3 comments for “Think tanks do control governments

  1. April 21, 2020 at 4:51 pm

    You are so right, James. It’s a parlous state of affairs.

    The lockdown has presented various countries’ citizens with further potential to break down the family: no visits in care homes, strict family segregation from people outside one’s household, minimal funeral attendance allowed.

    From a social distancing perspective, perhaps it had to be done.

    On the other hand, it’s not a good look.

    I watched this afternoon’s brief session in the House of Commons and was heartened to see several MPs (there weren’t many in attendance because of social distancing) ask for clarity on when the lockdown would be lifted.

    • April 21, 2020 at 6:42 pm

      Yes.

      Just about to read your post.

  2. Mona
    April 21, 2020 at 7:05 pm

    A very interesting interview on unherd.com of a SWEDISH SCIENTIST link from zerohedge .com

Comments are closed.