The Lowest Of Low Hanging Fruits…

 

 
It’s safe to say he didn’t get entirely the response he was no doubt expecting. He’d clearly forgotten that social media is Kryptonite to so many police Tweeters… 
 
Which, of course, merely reinforced in his own mind that he was right all along!
 

The Tweet he’s referring to is his brush with death due to Covid. I guess police fitness rates haven’t come up much, then?

H/T: StateControl via Twitter

12 comments for “The Lowest Of Low Hanging Fruits…

  1. Mona
    August 19, 2020 at 10:31 am

    Got a thrill out of humiliating someone who didn’t want to wear a bacteria factory?, I’m a Policeman so obey me you nobody, got to tell the world how powerful I am. You were just ACTING in front of your daughter, did you have an orgasm?

  2. Penseivat
    August 19, 2020 at 12:39 pm

    Despite it being Birmingham, I would suggest the ‘offender’ was white. I doubt that this would have happened if the person was a Muslim or a black person. He certainly wouldn’t have tweeted what he did, but possibly something like, “I understand, and fully support, the cultural elements of our Muslim and black citizens in this time of national stress.”
    Perhaps it’s the first time he’s produced his warrant card in public in years, hence the need to tell everyone about it.
    Just do your job, quietly, without the need for publicity and public adoration.

    • August 23, 2020 at 6:57 am

      I suspect you’re spot on…

  3. john in cheshire
    August 19, 2020 at 2:24 pm

    So, the indoctrination of the police is complete.
    Why couldn’t this jobsworth just keep his mouth shut? And stop spreading his own poisonous vapours. In fact, was this tool of the state wearing a mask; was his daughter?
    But the response by anyone who is in a similar position, perhaps should be:
    ‘I have a medical condition that prevents me from wearing a mask’.
    and if anyone asks for proof, the reply might be:
    ‘I’m not discussing my medical case with you, a stranger’.
    And if it turns out to be a member of the stasi, as in this case, ask him to provide a legal notice that requires disclosure of confidential information.

    The police are their own worst enemy, when they boast about things like this. And to use his daughter as a defence for his behaviour is quite shameful. Not forgetting that children are hardly affected by this virus.

  4. Valentine Gray
    August 19, 2020 at 4:55 pm

    If I had the Flu I would know it and stay indoors , the weirdest disease I can think of so dangerous I need a test to see if I have it or have had it and it is so easy to treat, but the Police are a social problem who are part of the Covid scam a surveillance and control programe because they want to know where you are every minute of the day. The mask is a LIE just like this government.

  5. John in Cheshire
    August 19, 2020 at 7:00 pm

    James, are you familiar with the Nuremberg Code? I wonder if what the government is doing to us with regard to masks and probably with vaccines, can be regarded as an experiment. Because if so, they can’t force to wear masks or be vaccinated against our will.

    Here’s an extract. The full code, which isn’t very long, can be found on the internet:

    This is the first part of the Nuremberg Code:

    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448,
    7 December 1996.

    Introduction

    The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
    This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongstother requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.

    This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.

    This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.

    The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.

    The Nuremberg Code (1947)

    Permissible Medical Experiments

    The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the
    practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must
    be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

    1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without
    the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching,
    or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision
    by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected;
    and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

    The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with any impunity.

    • August 20, 2020 at 10:09 am

      Are you sure this is the post you wanted to put this on, John?

      • John in Cheshire
        August 20, 2020 at 3:01 pm

        No, sorry. My mistake.
        Is it useful to you?
        I initially intended emailing it to you but the email address didn’t work.
        Sorry, Julia.

        • August 20, 2020 at 7:41 pm

          Cheers from us.

        • August 23, 2020 at 6:58 am

          No problem! 😉

  6. Stonyground
    August 21, 2020 at 6:08 pm

    It is a shame that he didn’t try this on with that guy from the Clapham railway station. Then his tweet wouldn’t have been so smug.

    • August 23, 2020 at 6:58 am

      Heh! Wouldn’t that have been delicious?

Comments are closed.